Affiliation:
1. School of Public Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology, 685 Cherry St., Atlanta, GA 30332, USA
Abstract
Throughout this paper I will argue that dynamical and structural instabilities are the sources of complexity and pattern formation. The argument can be accomplished by defending two theses. First, a demarcation thesis: two different approaches are predominant in mathematical sciences today — the symmetry-approach and the complexity-approach. Second, a synthesis thesis: although the two approaches differ, they can be connected and, further, to some degree integrated: instabilities are core concepts connecting the two approaches. However, in a specific sense we can say: evolution leads from symmetry to complexity by transitions across borders of instabilities. This paper will provide further arguments in favor of a structural unity in phenomenological diversity [Mainzer, 2005].
Publisher
World Scientific Pub Co Pte Lt
Subject
Applied Mathematics,Modelling and Simulation,Engineering (miscellaneous)
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Philosophy of Interdisciplinarity;HIST PHILOS TECHNOSC;2021-11-29
2. Introduction;Philosophy of Interdisciplinarity;2021-11-29
3. Computational chaos in complex networks;Journal of Complex Networks;2019-04-29
4. Is There Anything New Under the Sun?;Emergence and Modularity in Life Sciences;2019
5. Symmetry-breaking dynamics in development;Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences;2017-07-12