BLIND SIGNAL SEPARATION OF MIXTURES OF CHAOTIC PROCESSES: A COMPARISON BETWEEN INDEPENDENT COMPONENT ANALYSIS AND STATE SPACE MODELING

Author:

GALKA ANDREAS12,WONG KEVIN K. F.3,STEPHANI ULRICH1,OZAKI TOHRU4,SINIATCHKIN MICHAEL5

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neuropediatrics, University of Kiel, 24098 Kiel, Germany

2. Institute of Experimental and Applied Physics, University of Kiel, 24098 Kiel, Germany

3. Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA

4. Tohoku University, 28 Kawauchi, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8576, Japan

5. Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Goethe-University, 60528 Frankfurt am Main, Germany

Abstract

We perform a systematic comparison between different algorithms for solving the Blind Signal Separation problem. In particular, we compare five well-known algorithms for Independent Component Analysis (ICA) with a recently proposed algorithm based on linear state space modeling (IC–LSS). The comparison is based on simulated mixtures of six source signals, five of which are generated by nonlinear deterministic processes evolving on chaotic attractors. The quality of the reconstructed sources is quantified by two measures, one based on a distance measure implemented by a Frobenius norm, and one based on residual mutual information. We find that the IC–LSS modeling algorithm offers several advantages over the ICA algorithms: it succeeds in unmixing Gaussian sources, on short time series it performs, on average, better than static ICA algorithms, it does not try to remove coincidental dependencies resulting from finite data set size, and it shows the potential to reconstruct the sources even in the case of noninvertible mixing. As expected, for the case of non-Gaussian sources, invertible mixing and sufficient time series length, the ICA algorithms typically outperform IC–LSS modeling.

Publisher

World Scientific Pub Co Pte Lt

Subject

Applied Mathematics,Modelling and Simulation,Engineering (miscellaneous)

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3