When Do Security Markets Aggregate Dispersed Information?

Author:

Corgnet Brice1ORCID,Deck Cary23ORCID,DeSantis Mark34ORCID,Hampton Kyle5,Kimbrough Erik O.5ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Emlyon Business School, GATE L-SE, Lyon, 69130 Écully, France;

2. Department of Economics, Finance and Legal Studies, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama 35487;

3. Economic Science Institute, Chapman University, Orange, California 92866;

4. Argyros School of Business and Economics, Chapman University, Orange, California 92866;

5. Smith Institute for Political Economy and Philosophy, Argyros School of Business and Economics, Chapman University, Orange, California 92866

Abstract

We attempt to replicate a seminal paper that offered support for the rational expectations hypothesis and reported evidence that markets with certain features aggregate dispersed information. The original results are based on only a few observations, and our attempt to replicate the key findings with an appropriately powered experiment largely fails. The resulting poststudy probability that market performance is better described by rational expectations than the prior information (Walrasian) model under the conditions specified in the original paper is very low. As a result of our failure to replicate, we investigate an alternate set of market features that combines aspects of the original experimental design. For these markets, which include both contingent claims and homogeneous dividend payments (as in many prediction markets), we do find robust evidence of information aggregation in support of the rational expectations model. In total, our results indicate that information aggregation in asset markets is fragile and should only be expected in limited circumstances. This paper was accepted by Bruno Biais, finance.

Publisher

Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)

Subject

Management Science and Operations Research,Strategy and Management

Cited by 9 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Information aggregation with heterogeneous traders;Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance;2024-09

2. Nonspeculative bubbles revisited;Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance;2024-06

3. Resource allocation, computational complexity, and market design;Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance;2024-06

4. Bridging Theory and Empirical Research in Accounting;Journal of Accounting Research;2024-04-26

5. Persistent Private Information in Experimental Asset Markets;2024

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3