Human footprint and forest disturbance reduce space use of brown bears (Ursus arctos) across Europe

Author:

Hertel Anne G.ORCID,Parres Aida,Frank Shane C.ORCID,Renaud Julien,Selva NuriaORCID,Zedrosser AndreasORCID,Balkenhol NikoORCID,Maiorano LuigiORCID,Fedorca AncutaORCID,Dutta TrishnaORCID,Bogdanović NedaORCID,Bragalanti Natalia,Chiriac Silviu,Ćirović DuškoORCID,Ciucci PaoloORCID,Domokos CsabaORCID,Fedorca Mihai,Filacorda StefanoORCID,Finďo Slavomir,Groff Claudio,Hernando Miguel de Gabriel,Huber DjuroORCID,Ionescu Georgeta,Jerina KlemenORCID,Karamanlidis Alexandros A.ORCID,Kindberg JonasORCID,Kojola IlpoORCID,Mertzanis Yorgos,Palazon SantiagoORCID,Pop Mihai I.,Psaralexi MariaORCID,Quenette Pierre Yves,Sergiel AgnieszkaORCID,Skuban Michaela,Zlatanova DianaORCID,Zwijacz-Kozica TomaszORCID,De Barba MartaORCID

Abstract

AbstractThree-quarters of the planet’s land surface has been altered by humans, with consequences for animal ecology, movements and related ecosystem functioning. Species often occupy wide geographical ranges with contrasting human disturbance and environmental conditions, yet, limited data availability across species’ ranges has constrained our understanding of how human impact and resource availability jointly shape intraspecific variation of animal space use. Leveraging a unique dataset of 752 annual GPS movement trajectories from 370 brown bears (Ursus arctos) across the species’ range in Europe, we investigated the effects of human impact (i.e., human footprint index), resource availability, forest cover and disturbance, and area-based conservation measures on brown bear space use. We quantified space use at different spatio-temporal scales during the growing season (May - September): home range size; representing general space requirements, 10-day long-distance displacement distances, and routine 1-day displacement distances. We found large intraspecific variation in brown bear space use across all scales, which was profoundly affected by human footprint index, vegetation productivity, and recent forest disturbances creating opportunity for resource pulses. Bears occupied smaller home ranges and moved less in more anthropized landscapes and in areas of higher resource availability. Forest disturbances reduced space use while contiguous forest cover promoted longer daily movements. The amount of strictly protected and roadless areas within bear home ranges were too small to affect space use. Anthropized landscapes may hinder the expansion of small and isolated populations, such as the Apennine and Pyrenean, and obstruct population connectivity, for example between the Alpine or Carpathian with the Dinaric Pindos populations. Our findings call for actions to maintain bear movements across landscapes with high human footprint, for example by maintaining forest integrity, to support viable bear populations and their ecosystem functions.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3