Abstract
AbstractMicroplastics may affect soil ecosystem functioning in critical ways, with previously documented effects including changes in soil structure and water dynamics; this suggests that microbial populations and the processes they mediate could also be affected. Given the importance for global carbon and nitrogen cycle and greenhouse warming potential, we here experimentally examined potential effects of plastic microfiber additions on CO2 and N2O greenhouse gas fluxes. We carried out a fully factorial laboratory experiment with the factors presence of microplastic fibers (0.4% w/w) and addition of urea fertilizer (100 mg N kg−1). The conditions in an intensively N-fertilized arable soil were simulated by adding biogas digestate at the beginning of the incubation to all samples. We continuously monitored CO2 and N2O emissions from soil before and after urea application using a custom-built flow-through steady-state system, and we assessed soil properties, including soil structure. Microplastics affected soil properties, notably increasing soil aggregate water-stability and pneumatic conductivity, and caused changes in the dynamics and overall level of emission of both gases, but in opposite directions: overall fluxes of CO2 were increased by microplastic presence, whereas N2O emission were decreased, a pattern that was intensified following urea addition. This divergent response is explained by effects of microplastic on soil structure, with the increased air permeability likely improving O2 supply: this will have stimulated CO2 production, since mineralization benefits from better aeration. Increased O2 would at the same time have inhibited denitrification, a process contributing to N2O emissions, thus likely explaining the decrease in the latter. Our results clearly suggest that microplastic consequences for greenhouse gas emissions should become an integral part of future impact assessments, and that to understand such responses, soil structure should be assessed.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference79 articles.
1. Is nitrogen the next carbon?;Earths Future,2017
2. Responses of ecosystem nitrogen cycle to nitrogen addition: a meta‐analysis
3. Erisman, J. W. ; Galloway, J. N. ; Seitzinger, S. ; Bleeker, A. ; Dise, N. B. ; Petrescu, A. M. R. ; Leach, A. M. ; de Vries, W. , Consequences of human modification of the global nitrogen cycle. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 2013, 368, (1621).
4. Fowler, D. ; Pyle, J. A. ; Raven, J. A. ; Sutton, M. A. , The global nitrogen cycle in the twenty-first century: introduction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 2013, 368, (1621).
5. A World of Cobenefits: Solving the Global Nitrogen Challenge;Earths Future,2019