Abstract
ABSTRACTBackgroundThe understanding of how varying radiation beam parameter settings affect the induction and magnitude of the FLASH effect remains limited.PurposeWe sought to evaluate how the magnitude of radiation-induced gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity (RIGIT) depends on the interplay between mean dose rate (MDR) and dose per pulse (DPP).MethodsC57BL/6J mice were subjected to total abdominal irradiation (11-14 Gy single fraction) under conventional irradiation (low DPP and low MDR, CONV) and various combinations of DPP and MDR up to ultra-high-dose-rate (UHDR) beam conditions. The effects of DPP were evaluated for DPPs of 1-6 Gy while the total dose and MDR were kept constant; the effects of MDR were evaluated for the range 0.3– 1440 Gy/s while the total dose and DPP were kept constant. RIGIT was quantified in non-tumor–bearing mice through the regenerating crypt assay and survival assessment. Tumor response was evaluated through tumor growth delay.ResultsWithin each tested total dose using a constant MDR (>100 Gy/s), increasing DPP led to better sparing of regenerating crypts, with a more prominent effect seen at 12 and 14 Gy TAI. However, at fixed DPPs >4 Gy, similar sparing of crypts was demonstrated irrespective of MDR (from 0.3 to 1440 Gy/s). At a fixed high DPP of 4.7 Gy, survival was equivalently improved relative to CONV for all MDRs from 0.3 Gy/s to 104 Gy/s, but at a lower DPP of 0.93 Gy, increasing MDR produced a greater survival effect. We also confirmed that high DPP, regardless of MDR, produced the same magnitude of tumor growth delay relative to CONV using a clinically relevant melanoma mouse model.ConclusionsThis study demonstrates the strong influence that the beam parameter settings have on the magnitude of the FLASH effect. Both high DPP and UHDR appeared independently sufficient to produce FLASH sparing of GI toxicity, while isoeffective tumor response was maintained across all conditions.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference45 articles.
1. Clinical translation of FLASH radiotherapy: Why and how?
2. Flash radiotherapy: Newsflash or flash in the pan?;Med Phys,2019
3. Favaudon V , Caplier L , Monceau V , Pouzoulet F , Sayarath M , Fouillade C , Poupon MF , Brito I , Hupé P , Bourhis J , Hall J , Fontaine JJ , Vozenin MC . Ultrahigh dose-rate flash irradiation increases the differential response between normal and tumor tissue in mice. Science Translational Medicine 2014;6.
4. Ultra-high dose rate electron beams and the flash effect: From preclinical evidence to a new radiotherapy paradigm;Med Phys,2022
5. Vozenin MC , Loo B , Tantawi S , Maxim P , Spitz DR , Bailat C , Limoli CL . Flash: New intersection of physics, chemistry, biology, and cancer medicine. Rev Mod Phys 2024;In press.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献