Abstract
ABSTRACTExtractive foraging is generally studied from the perspective of behavioral flexibility, cognitive ability, innovation and social learning. Despite its potential to elucidate synanthropic adaptation in species exploiting enclosed anthropogenic food, research on extractive foraging under urban conditions is limited. Since a large extent of anthropogenic food is packaged and contains highly processed food, processes of identification/extraction of food by nonhuman species become intriguing themes of research. We studied how processing status of embedded food determined extraction decisions across groups of a species differing in exposure and familiarity to the food. Further, we tested the generalizability of extraction methods. Experimenting with wild bonnet macaques (Macaca radiata), we found exposure- and form (native/shelled/peeled)-specific familiarity to peanuts, state (raw/boiled/roasted)-specific distinction in depeeling, and exposure- and state-specific differences in methods of depeeling. Group with the highest exposure to peanut differed in its propensity to use sophisticated extraction methods, e.g. depeeling by rubbing between palms (bimanual asymmetric action) and rubbing against horizontal substrata (unimanual action). The innovative methods were also extended to roasted peas and chickpeas by the urban group. Our study establishes a causal relationship between familiarity and processing status of food and shows the generalized extension of extraction methods based on food categorization.Summary StatementNonhuman species in cities face upheaval challenges of accessing enclosed and highly processed anthropogenic food. We studied the effects of minor processing of enclosed food on its extraction decisions.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory