Abstract
AbstractCancerous tumors may contain billions of cells including distinct malignant clones and nonmalignant cell types. Clarifying the evolutionary histories, prevalence, and defining molecular features of these cells is essential for improving clinical outcomes, since intratumoral heterogeneity provides fuel for acquired resistance to targeted therapies. Here we present a statistically motivated strategy for deconstructing intratumoral heterogeneity through multiomic and multiscale analysis of serial tumor sections (MOMA). By combining deep sampling of IDH-mutant astrocytomas with integrative analysis of single-nucleotide variants, copy-number variants, and gene expression, we reconstruct and validate the phylogenies, spatial distributions, and transcriptional profiles of distinct malignant clones, which are not observed in normal human brain samples. Importantly, by genotyping nuclei analyzed by single-nucleus RNA-seq for truncal mutations identified from bulk tumor sections, we show that commonly used algorithms for inferring malignancy from single-cell transcriptomes may be inaccurate. Furthermore, we demonstrate how correlating gene expression with tumor purity in bulk samples provides the same information as differential expression analysis of malignant versus nonmalignant cells and use this approach to identify a core set of genes that is consistently expressed by astrocytoma truncal clones, includingAKR1C3, whose expression is associated with poor outcomes in several types of cancer. In summary, MOMA provides a robust and flexible strategy for precisely deconstructing intratumoral heterogeneity in clinical specimens and clarifying the molecular profiles of distinct cellular populations in any kind of solid tumor.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory