Abstract
SummaryBackgroundSurrogates of antiviral efficacy are needed for COVID-19. We investigated the relationship between the virological effect of treatment and clinical efficacy as measured by progression to severe disease in unvaccinated outpatients treated for mild to moderate COVID-19.MethodsWe searched PubMed, Scopus and medRxiv from inception to 27thSeptember 2022, for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) which tested potential treatments for COVID-19 in non-hospitalized patients. We included studies that reported both clinical and virological outcomes. Clinical outcomes were the rate of disease progression (generally hospitalization or death within 28 days of commencing treatment) and virological outcomes were viral load (viral RNA copies in upper respiratory tract swabs) within the first 7 days of treatment. Studies were excluded if they did not report on the outcome of a primary randomised controlled trial, or if results were reported in a more complete form in another publication. Risk of Bias assessment was performed using the RoB 2.0 tool. We used generalised linear models with random effects to assess the association between outcomes and account for study heterogeneity.FindingsWe identified 1372 unique studies of which 14 (with a total of 9257 participants) met inclusion criteria. Larger virological treatment effects at both day 3 and day 5 were associated with decreased odds of progression to hospitalisation or death in unvaccinated ambulatory subjects. The odds ratio (OR) for each extra two-fold reduction in viral load in treated compared to control subjects was 0.54 on both days 3 and 5 post treatment (day 3 95% CI 0.38 to 0.74, day 5 95%CI 0.41 to 0.72). There was no relationship between the odds of hospitalisation or death and virological treatment effect at day 7 (OR 0.91, 95%CI 0.74 to 1.13).InterpretationThis review provides evidence that treatment-induced acceleration of viral clearance within the first 5 days after treatment is a surrogate of clinical efficacy to prevent hospitalisation with COVID-19. Limitations included the aggregation of studies with differing designs, and evidence of risk of bias in some virological outcomes. These findings support the use of viral clearance as an early phase clinical trial endpoint of therapeutic efficacy.FundingThe authors were supported by the Australian Government Department of Health, Medical Research Future Fund, National Health and Medical Research Council and the University of New South Wales.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference28 articles.
1. Stadler E , Chai KL , Schlub TE , et al. Determinants of passive antibody efficacy in SARS-CoV-2 infection. medRxiv 2022: 2022.03.21.22272672.
2. Montgomery H , Hobbs FDR , Padilla F , et al. Efficacy and safety of intramuscular administration of tixagevimab-cilgavimab for early outpatient treatment of COVID-19 (TACKLE): a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Respir Med 2022.
3. Therapeutics for COVID-19;Nature Microbiology,2023
4. FDA. Surrogate endpoint resources for drug and biologic development. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/development-resources/surrogate-endpoint-resources-drug-and-biologic-development (accessed 05 June 2023).
5. Modelling hepatitis C therapy—predicting effects of treatment
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献