Author:
Macgregor Callum J.,Kitson James J.N.,Fox Richard,Hahn Christoph,Lunt David H.,Pocock Michael J.O.,Evans Darren M.
Abstract
AbstractMoths are globally relevant as pollinators but nocturnal pollination remains poorly understood. Plant-pollinator interaction networks are traditionally constructed using either flower-visitor observations or pollen-transport detection using microscopy. Recent studies have shown the potential of DNA metabarcoding for detecting and identifying pollen-transport interactions. However, no study has directly compared the realised observations of pollen-transport networks between DNA metabarcoding and conventional light microscopy.Using matched samples of nocturnal moths, we construct pollen-transport networks using two methods: light microscopy and DNA metabarcoding. Focussing on the feeding mouthparts of moths, we develop and provide reproducible methods for merging DNA metabarcoding and ecological network analysis to better understand species-interactions.DNA metabarcoding detected pollen on more individual moths, and detected multiple pollen types on more individuals than microscopy, but the average number of pollen types per individual was unchanged. However, after aggregating individuals of each species, metabarcoding detected more interactions per moth species. Pollen-transport network metrics differed between methods, because of variation in the ability of each to detect multiple pollen types per moth and to separate morphologically-similar or related pollen. We detected unexpected but plausible moth-plant interactions with metabarcoding, revealing new detail about nocturnal pollination systems.The nocturnal pollination networks observed using metabarcoding and microscopy were similar, yet distinct, with implications for network ecologists. Comparisons between networks constructed using metabarcoding and traditional methods should therefore be treated with caution. Nevertheless, the potential applications of metabarcoding for studying plant-pollinator interaction networks are encouraging, especially when investigating understudied pollinators such as moths.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference62 articles.
1. Ballantyne, G. , Baldock, K.C.R. & Willmer, P.G. (2015) Constructing more informative plant-pollinator networks: visitation and pollen deposition networks in a heathland plant community. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 282, 20151130.
2. The structure and robustness of nocturnal Lepidopteran pollen-transfer networks in a Biodiversity Hotspot;Insect Conservation and Diversity,2015
3. Relative effects of nocturnal vs diurnal pollinators and distance on gene flow in small Silene alba populations;The New Phytologist,2006
4. A technique for the study of insect-borne pollen;The Pan-Pacific Entomologist,1972
5. Review and future prospects for DNA barcoding methods in forensic palynology;Forensic Science International: Genetics,2016
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Flower–bee versus pollen–bee metanetworks in fragmented landscapes;Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences;2024-05