Flower–bee versus pollen–bee metanetworks in fragmented landscapes

Author:

Librán-Embid Felipe12,Grass Ingo34,Emer Carine5,Alarcón-Segura Viviana16,Behling Hermann7,Biagioni Siria7,Ganuza Cristina8,Herrera-Krings Celina1,Setyaningsih Christina Ani7,Tscharntke Teja1

Affiliation:

1. Agroecology, University of Göttingen , Göttingen 37077, Germany

2. Justus Liebig University of Gießen, Institute of Animal Ecology and Systematics, Heinrich-Buff-Ring 26 , Gießen 35390, Germany

3. Department of Ecology of Tropical Agricultural Systems, University of Hohenheim , Stuttgart 70599, Germany

4. Center for Biodiversity and Integrative Taxonomy (KomBioTa), University of Hohenheim , Stuttgart 70599, Germany

5. Instituto de Pesquisas Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro, Rua Pacheco Leão, 915, Jardim Botânico , Rio de Janeiro CEP22460-030, Brazil

6. Animal Ecology, Department of Biology, University of Marburg , Marburg 35037, Germany

7. Department of Palynology and Climate Dynamics, Albrecht‐von‐Haller‐Institute for Plant Sciences, University of Göttingen , Göttingen 37077, Germany

8. Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, University of Würzburg , Würzburg 97074, Germany

Abstract

Understanding the organization of mutualistic networks at multiple spatial scales is key to ensure biological conservation and functionality in human-modified ecosystems. Yet, how changing habitat and landscape features affect pollen–bee interaction networks is still poorly understood. Here, we analysed how bee–flower visitation and bee–pollen-transport interactions respond to habitat fragmentation at the local network and regional metanetwork scales, combining data from 29 fragments of calcareous grasslands, an endangered biodiversity hotspot in central Europe. We found that only 37% of the total unique pairwise species interactions occurred in both pollen-transport and flower visitation networks, whereas 28% and 35% were exclusive to pollen-transport and flower visitation networks, respectively. At local level, network specialization was higher in pollen-transport networks, and was negatively related to the diversity of land cover types in both network types. At metanetwork level, pollen transport data revealed that the proportion of single-fragment interactions increased with landscape diversity. Our results show that the specialization of calcareous grasslands’ plant–pollinator networks decreases with landscape diversity, but network specialization is underestimated when only based on flower visitation information. Pollen transport data, more than flower visitation, and multi-scale analyses of metanetworks are fundamental for understanding plant–pollinator interactions in human-dominated landscapes.

Funder

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

FAPERJ

FAPESP

Publisher

The Royal Society

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Flower–bee versus pollen–bee metanetworks in fragmented landscapes;Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences;2024-05

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3