Organizing laboratory information to analyze the reproducibility of experimental workflows

Author:

Peccoud JeanORCID,Johnson Derek,Peccoud Samuel,Setchell Julia,Zhou Wen

Abstract

AbstractReproducibility is the cornerstone of scientific experiments. Assessing the reproducibility of an experiment requires analyzing the contribution of different factors to the variation of the observed data. Suitable data structures need to be defined prior to the data collection effort so that data associated with these factors can be recorded and associated with observations of the variable of interest. The resulting datasets can be analyzed statistically to estimate the effect of experimental factors on the observed data using ANOVA models. Custom data structures to document the execution of experimental workflows are defined in a research data management system. The data produced by multiple repetitions of a plasmid purification process and a cell culture process are analyzed using the Kruskal–Wallis H-test to identify factors contributing to their variation. Repetitions of the plasmid purification process do not lead to significant differences in extraction yields. Statistically significant differences in plasmid solution purity are identified but the differences are small enough that are not biologically relevant. The maintenance of two cell lines over many generations leads to similar datasets. However, different media preparations appear to influence the variation of cell viability and harvested cell counts in unexpected ways that may be the indirect expression of hidden effects not captured in the data structure.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference55 articles.

1. Reproducibility

2. Journals unite for reproducibility

3. Progress on reproducibility

4. National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine (U.S.). Committee on Reproducibility and Replicability in Science, National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine (U.S.). Nuclear and Radiation Studies Board, National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine (U.S.). Board on Research Data and Information, and National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine (U.S.). Board on Mathematical Sciences and Analytics, Reproducibility and replicability in science. A consensus study report of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, Medicine. 2019, Washington, DC: National Academies Press, xxi, 234 pages.

5. Reproducibility vs. Replicability: A Brief History of a Confused Terminology;Front Neuroinform,2017

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3