Abstract
AbstractThe study assessed a mobile electroencephalography (EEG) system with water-based electrodes for its applicability in cognitive and behavioural neuroscience. It was compared to a standard gel-based wired system. EEG was recorded on two occasions (first with gel-based, then water-based system) as participants completed the flanker task. Technical and practical considerations for the application of the water-based system are reported based on participant and experimenter experiences. Empirical comparisons focused on EEG data noise levels, frequency power across four bands (theta, alpha, low beta and high beta) and event-related components (P300 and ERN). The water-based system registered more noise compared to the gel-based system which resulted in increased loss of data during artefact rejection. Signal to noise ratio was significantly lower for the water-based system in the parietal channels which impacted the observed parietal beta power. It also led to a shift in topography of the maximal P300 activity from parietal to frontal regions. It is also evident, that the water-based system may be prone to slow drift noise which may affect the reliability and consistency of low frequency band analyses. Practical considerations for the use of water-based electrode EEG systems are provided.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference42 articles.
1. How much baseline correction do we need in ERP research? Extended GLM model can replace baseline correction while lifting its limits
2. Brain Products. (n.d). Brainamp Mr Plus. Gilching, DE.
3. Brain Producs. (n.d.). Easycap System Kit. Stans, CH.
4. Brain Products. (2012). BrainVision Recorder & Analyzer 1.2. Gilching, DE.
5. Brain Porducts GmbH. (2019). BrainVision Analyzer | User Manual Software Version 2.2.0. Gilching, DE.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献