Mathematically and biologically consistent framework for presence-absence pairwise indices of diversity

Author:

Šizling A.L.,Tjørve E.,Tjørve K.M.C.,žárský J.D.,Keil P.,Storch D.

Abstract

AbstractAimA large number of indices that compare two or more assemblages have been proposed or reinvented. The interpretation of the indices varies across the literature, despite efforts for clarification and unification. Most of the effort has focused on interdependence between the indices and the mathematics behind them. At the same time, following issues have been underestimated: (i) the difference between statistical independence of indices and the independence based on their informational value, and (ii) the inferences from the indices about diversity patterns and phenomena. Here we offer an alternative framework for diversity indices.MethodsWe distinguish different classes of dependence, and show that three indices which are mutually independent in terms of their information content are sufficient for appropriate inferences. This applies regardless of whether the indices are statistically correlated or not. We classify 20 existing indices into three main and four minor mutually independent families, and demonstrate how similarity between assemblages violates the stability of the families, confusing conceptually different patterns. We show what can be inferred about spatial diversity phenomena from different indices, demonstrate problems with most of the indices of nestedness, and show which combinations of indices may be used for meaningful ecological inference.Results and Main conclusionsWe demonstrate that no single index can properly filter out a single effect of a phenomena because the phenomena inevitably bound each other (e.g. species richness gradient bounds possible values of Jaccard index of community similarity). Consequently, inventing indices which seemingly purify these effect (e.g. pure turnover or pure nestedness) leads to misleading inference. In contrast, a proper inference is obtained by using a combination of classical indices from different, mutually independent families. Our framework provides a practical clue how to compare different indices across the literature.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3