Optimising social mixing strategies to mitigate the impact of COVID-19 in six European countries: a mathematical modelling study
Author:
Ragonnet Romain, Briffoteaux Guillaume, Williams Bridget M., Savulescu Julian, Segal Matthew, Abayawardana Milinda, Eggo Rosalind M.ORCID, Tuyttens Daniel, Melab Nouredine, Marais Ben J., McBryde Emma S., Trauer James M.
Abstract
ABSTRACTBackgroundIf SARS-CoV-2 elimination is not feasible, strategies are needed to minimise the impact of COVID-19 in the medium-to-long term, until safe and effective vaccines can be used at the population-level.MethodsUsing a mathematical model, we identified contact mitigation strategies that minimised COVID-19-related deaths or years of life lost (YLLs) over a time-horizon of 15 months, using an intervention lasting six or 12 months, in Belgium, France, Italy, Spain, Sweden and the UK. We used strategies that either altered age- or location-specific contact patterns. The optimisation was performed under the constraint that herd immunity should be achieved by the end of the intervention period if post-infection immunity was persistent. We then tested the effect of waning immunity on the strategies.FindingsStrategies of contact mitigation by age were much more effective than those based on mitigation by location. Extremely stringent contact reductions for individuals aged over 50 were required in most countries to minimise deaths or YLLs. The median final proportion of the population ever-infected with SARS-CoV-2 after herd immunity was reached ranged between 30% and 43%, depending on the country and intervention duration. Compared to an unmitigated scenario, optimised age-specific mitigation was predicted to avert over 1 million deaths across the six countries. The optimised scenarios assuming persistent immunity resulted in comparable hospital occupancies to that experienced during the March-April European wave. However, if immunity was shortlived, high burdens were expected without permanent contact mitigation.InterpretationOur analysis suggests that age-selective mitigation strategies can reduce the mortality impacts of COVID-19 dramatically even when significant transmission occurs. The stringency of the required restrictions in some groups raises concerns about the practicality of these strategies. If post-infection immunity was short-lived, solutions based on a mitigation period designed to increase population immunity should be accompanied with ongoing contact mitigation to prevent large epidemic resurgence.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference39 articles.
1. T. Hale , N. Angrist , B. Kira , A. Petherick , T. Phillips , and S. Webster , “Variation in government responses to COVID-19 Version 6.0. Blavatnik School of Government Working Paper.,” tech. rep., Blavatnik School of Government, may 2020. 2. A. S. F. Kwong , R. M. Pearson , M. J. Adams , K. Northstone , K. Tilling , et al., “Mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic in two longitudinal UK population cohorts,” medRxiv, p. 2020.06.16.20133116, jun 2020. 3. M. Pierce , H. Hope , T. Ford , S. Hatch , M. Hotopf , and Jothers, “Mental health before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal probability sample survey of the UK population,” The Lancet Psychiatry, vol. 0, jul 2020. 4. C. Maringe , J. Spicer , M. Morris , A. Purushotham , E. Nolte , et al., “The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer deaths due to delays in diagnosis in England, UK: a national, population-based, modelling study,” The Lancet Oncology, vol. 0, jul 2020. 5. B. J. Marais and T. C. Sorrell , “Pathways to COVID-19 ‘community protection’,” 2020.
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|