Reelin’ In The Years: Age and Selective Restriction of Liberty in the COVID-19 Pandemic

Author:

Motorniak David,Savulescu Julian,Giubilini Alberto

Abstract

AbstractDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, focused protection strategies including selective lockdowns of the elderly were proposed as alternatives to general lockdowns. These selective restrictions would consist of isolating only those most at risk of COVID-19 hospitalization and subsequent use of healthcare resources. The proposal seems to have troubling implications, including the permissibility of selective lockdown on the basis of characteristics such as ethnicity, sex, disability, or BMI. Like age, these factors also correlated with an increased risk of hospitalization from COVID-19. In this paper, we argue that age has meaningful differences as a morally relevant characteristic in the justification for selective restrictions of liberty. Thus, it might justify selective freedom restrictions in a way in which other factors might not. We offer four moral domains that separate age from other proxies: empiricism, operationality, discrimination, and disparity.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Health Policy,Health (social science)

Reference36 articles.

1. Australian Human Rights Commission. 2020. Ageism and COVID-19 [Internet]. Canberra, Australia. https://humanrights.gov.au/about/news/ageism-and-covid-19. Accessed October 4, 2021.

2. Banks, J., H. Karjalainen, and C. Propper. 2020. Recessions and health: The long-term health consequences of responses to the coronavirus. Fiscal Studies 41(2): 337–344.

3. Bhavsar, V., K. Kirkpatrick, M. Calcia, and L.M. Howard. 2021. Lockdown, domestic abuse perpetration, and mental health care: Gaps in training, research, and policy. Lancet Psychiatry 8(3):172–174.

4. Blunkett, D. 2020. It’s divisive and wrong—Please don’t stigmatise my generation: Former Home Secretary DAVID BLUNKETT, 72, says ordering the elderly to quarantine themselves is unfair [Internet]. The Daily Mail, March 16. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-8115207/FormerHome-Secretary-DAVID-BLUNKETT-says-ordering-elderly-quarantine-unfair.html.

5. Cameron, J., B. Williams, R. Ragonnet, B. Marais, J. Trauer, and J. Savulescu. 2021. Ethics of selective restriction of liberty in a pandemic. Journal of Medical Ethics 47(8): 1–10.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3