Abstract
AbstractBackgroundLarge language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT showed great potential in aiding medical research. A heavy workload in filtering records is needed during the research process of evidence-based medicine, especially meta-analysis. However, no study tried to use LLMs to help screen records in meta-analysis. In this research, we aimed to explore the possibility of incorporating ChatGPT to facilitate the screening step based on the title and abstract of records during meta-analysis.MethodsTo assess our strategy, we selected three meta-analyses from the literature, together with a glioma meta-analysis embedded in the study, as additional validation. For the automatic selection of records from curated meta-analyses, a four-step strategy called LARS was developed, consisting of (1) criteria selection and single-prompt (prompt with one criterion) creation, (2) best combination identification, (3) combined-prompt (prompt with one or more criteria) creation, and (4) request sending and answer summary. We evaluated the robustness of the response from ChatGPT with repeated requests. Recall, workload reduction, precision, and F1 score were calculated to assess the performance of LARS.FindingsChatGPT showed a stable response for repeated requests (robustness score: 0·747 – 0·996). A variable performance was found between different single-prompts with a mean recall of 0·841. Based on these single-prompts, we were able to find combinations with performance better than the pre-set threshold. Finally, with a best combination of criteria identified, LARS showed a 39·5% workload reduction on average with a recall greater than 0·9. In the glioma meta-analysis, we found no prognostic effect of CD8+ TIL on overall survival, progress-free survival, and survival time after immunotherapy.InterpretationWe show here the groundbreaking finding that automatic selection of literature for meta-analysis is possible with ChatGPT. We provide it here as a pipeline, LARS, which showed a great workload reduction while maintaining a pre-set recall.FundingChina Scholarship Council.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献