BRCA-DIRECT digital pathway for diagnostic germline genetic testing within a UK breast oncology setting: a randomised, non-inferiority trial

Author:

Torr B.ORCID,Jones C.,Kavanaugh G.ORCID,Hamill M.ORCID,Allen S.ORCID,Choi S.,Garrett A.ORCID,Valganon-Petrizan M.,MacMahon S.,Yuan L.,Way R.ORCID,Harder H.ORCID,Gold R.,Taylor A.,Gabe R.,Lucassen A.,Manchanda R.ORCID,Fallowfield L.ORCID,Jenkins V.ORCID,Gandhi A.,Evans D.G.,George A.,Hubank M.ORCID,Kemp Z.,Bremner S.,Turnbull C.ORCID

Abstract

ABSTRACTBACKGROUNDGenetic testing to identify germline high-risk pathogenic variants in breast cancer susceptibility genes is an important step in the breast cancer diagnostic pathway. To expand capacity and reduce turnaround time, testing is increasingly offered within ‘mainstream’ oncology services, rather than via referral to clinical genetics. However, mainstream capacity is also stretched, as testing is offered to greater proportions of patients. Novel patient-centred pathways may offer opportunity for improved access.PATIENTS AND METHODSWe recruited 1,140 women with unselected breast cancer to undergo germline genetic testing through the BRCA-DIRECT digital pathway; compromising at-home saliva sampling and consenting, with access to a digital dashboard to complete tasks and a genetic counselling telephone hotline.Ahead of consenting to the test, participants were randomised to receive information about genetic testing digitally (569/1140, 49.9%) or via a pre-test genetic counselling consultation (571/1140, 50.1%). The primary outcome was uptake of genetic testing. We also measured patient knowledge, anxiety, and satisfaction, and conducted a healthcare professional survey.RESULTS1,001 (87.8%) participants progressed to receive their pre-test information and consented to testing. Uptake was higher within participants randomised to receive digital information compared with those randomised to a pre-test genetic counselling consultation (90.8% (95% CI: 88.5% to 93.1%) vs 84.7% (95% CI: 81.8% to 87.6%), p=0.002, adjusted for participant age and site). Non-inferiority was observed in relation to all other outcomes evaluated. Usage of the telephone hotline was modest (<20% of participants; 1,441 total minutes, 344 clinical minutes recorded) and, of 37 healthcare professionals surveyed, there was majority agreement that all elements of the pathway were equivalent to current standard-of-care.CONCLUSIONFindings demonstrate that standardised, digital information offers a non-inferior alternative to conventional genetic counselling consultation, and that an end-to-end patient-centred, digital pathway (supported by genetic counselling hotline) could feasibly be implemented into mainstream breast oncology settings.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3