Comparison of two sampling, quenching and extraction methods for quantitative yeasts metabolomics

Author:

Li XiangORCID,Rovetta Mattia,van Dam Patricia T.N.,Pabst Martin,Heinemann MatthiasORCID

Abstract

ABSTRACTKnowing intracellular metabolite concentrations is important for fundamental metabolism research as well as for biotechnology. The first steps in a quantitative metabolomics workflow, i.e., sampling, quenching, and extraction, are key to obtaining unbiased quantitative data. A qualified quenching and extraction method not only needs to rapidly terminate the in vivo biochemical reaction activities to preserve the endogenous metabolite levels but also has to fully extract all metabolites from cells. Recently, two different filtration-based sampling, quenching, and extraction methods have been proposed and used for quantitative yeast metabolomics. One method integrates the quenching and extraction into one step using a methanol-acetonitrile-water solution after a filtration step, while the other —more conventional— method quenches with cold methanol and extracts with boiling ethanol. In this study, we tested whether these two methods are equally well suited for quantitative metabolome analyses with yeast. Using isotope dilution mass spectrometry (IDMS) with GC-MS and LC-MS as analytical methods, in combination with precise quantification of cell volumes, we determined absolute concentrations of 63 intracellular metabolites covering amino acids, organic acids, phosphorylated sugars, and nucleotides in two S. cerevisiae strains with different physiology. By analyzing the data from samples generated with the two methods, we found that while both methods yielded essentially identical concentrations for amino and organic acids, the cold-solvent extraction yielded significantly lower concentrations for particularly phosphorylated sugars and nucleotides, presumably because of lower quenching or extraction efficiency of this method. Our results show that methanol-quenching combined with boiling-ethanol-extraction is the more accurate approach when aiming to quantify a broad range of different metabolites from yeast cells. The significant discrepancy observed between both common metabolite extraction methods demonstrates the importance of method optimization for quantitative studies in particular when working with microbes with rigid cell walls such as those found in yeast.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3