Author:
Raiho Ann,Dietze Michael,Dawson Andria,Rollinson Christine R.,Tipton John,McLachlan Jason
Abstract
AbstractUnderestimation of uncertainty in ecology runs the risk of producing precise, but inaccurate predictions. Most predictions from ecological models account for only a subset of the various components of uncertainty, making it diffcult to determine which uncertainties drive inaccurate predictions. To address this issue, we leveraged the forecast-analysis cycle and created a new state data assimilation algorithm that accommodates non-normal datasets and incorporates a commonly left-out uncertainty, process error covariance. We evaluated this novel algorithm with a case study where we assimilated 50 years of tree-ring-estimated aboveground biomass data into a forest gap model. To test assumptions about which uncertainties dominate forecasts of forest community and carbon dynamics, we partitioned hindcast variance into five uncertainty components. Contrary to the assumption that demographic stochasticity dominates forest gap dynamics, we found that demographic stochasticity alone massively underestimated forecast uncertainty (0.09% of the total uncertainty) and resulted in overconfident, biased model predictions. Similarly, despite decades of reliance on unconstrained “spin-ups” to initialize models, initial condition uncertainty declined very little over the forecast period and constraining initial conditions with data led to large increases in prediction accuracy. Process uncertainty, which up until now had been diffcult to estimate in mechanistic ecosystem model projections, dominated the prediction uncertainty over the forecast time period (49.1%), followed by meteorological uncertainty (32.5%). Parameter uncertainty, a recent focus of the modeling community, contributed 18.3%. These findings call into question our conventional wisdom about how to improve forest community and carbon cycle projections. This foundation can be used to test long standing modeling assumptions across fields in global change biology and specifically challenges the conventional wisdom regarding which aspects dominate uncertainty in the forest gap models.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference100 articles.
1. Aber, J. D. , 1982. Fortnite: a computer model of organic matter and nitrogen dynamics in forest ecosystems. Wisconsin. University. College of Agricultural and Life Sciences. Research Division. Research bulletin (USA).
2. The Red Maple Paradox
3. Assessing uncertainties in land cover projections;Global Change Biology,2017
4. The data assimilation research testbed: A community facility;Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society,2009
5. Imaging spectroscopy-and lidar-derived estimates of canopy composition and structure to improve predictions of forest carbon fluxes and ecosystem dynamics;Geophysical Research Letters,2014
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献