Leveraging three-dimensional chromatin architecture for effective reconstruction of enhancer-target gene regulatory network
Author:
Salviato Elisa,Djordjilović Vera,Hariprakash Judith M.,Tagliaferri Ilario,Pal Koustav,Ferrari Francesco
Abstract
ABSTRACTA growing amount of evidence in literature suggests that germline sequence variants and somatic mutations in non-coding distal regulatory elements may be crucial for defining disease risk and prognostic stratification of patients, in genetic disorders as well as in cancer. Their functional interpretation is challenging because genome-wide enhancer-target gene (ETG) pairing is an open problem in genomics. The solutions proposed so far do not account for the most updated knowledge on chromatin three-dimensional (3D) architecture, which is organized in a hierarchy of structural domains.Here we introduce a paradigm shift based on the definition of multi-scale structural chromatin domains, integrated in a statistical framework to define ETG pairs. In this work i) we develop a computational and statistical framework to reconstruct a comprehensive ETG regulatory network leveraging functional genomics data; ii) we demonstrate that the incorporation of chromatin 3D architecture information improves ETG pairing accuracy; and iii) we use multiple experimental datasets to extensively benchmark our method against previous solutions for the genome-wide reconstruction of ETG pairs. This solution will facilitate the annotation and interpretation of sequence variants in distal non-coding regulatory elements. We expect this to be especially helpful in clinically oriented applications of whole genome sequencing in cancer and undiagnosed genetic diseases research.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference89 articles.
1. Roadmap Epigenomics Consortium, Kundaje, A. , Meuleman, W. , Ernst, J. , Bilenky, M. , Yen, A. , Heravi-Moussavi, A. , Kheradpour, P. , Zhang, Z. , Wang, J. , et al. (2015) Integrative analysis of 111 reference human epigenomes. Nature, 518. 2. Nott, A. , Holtman, I.R. , Coufal, N.G. , Schlachetzki, J.C.M. , Yu, M. , Hu, R. , Han, C.Z. , Pena, M. , Xiao, J. , Wu, Y. , et al. (2019) Brain cell type–specific enhancer–promoter interactome maps and disease-risk association. Science (80-.)., 366. 3. De Laat, W. and Duboule, D. (2013) Topology of mammalian developmental enhancers and their regulatory landscapes. Nature, 502. 4. Schoenfelder, S. and Fraser, P. (2019) Long-range enhancer–promoter contacts in gene expression control. Nat. Rev. Genet., 20. 5. Gallagher, M.D. and Chen-Plotkin, A.S. (2018) The Post-GWAS Era: From Association to Function. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 102.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|