Computational model of the distributed representation of operant reward memory: combinatoric engagement of intrinsic and synaptic plasticity mechanisms

Abstract

Operant reward learning of feeding behavior in Aplysia increases the frequency and regularity of biting, as well as biases buccal motor patterns (BMPs) toward ingestion-like BMPs (iBMPs). The engram underlying this memory comprises cells that are part of a central pattern generating (CPG) circuit and includes increases in the intrinsic excitability of identified cells B30, B51, B63, and B65, and increases in B63–B30 and B63–B65 electrical synaptic coupling. To examine the ways in which sites of plasticity (individually and in combination) contribute to memory expression, a model of the CPG was developed. The model included conductance-based descriptions of cells CBI-2, B4, B8, B20, B30, B31, B34, B40, B51, B52, B63, B64, and B65, and their synaptic connections. The model generated patterned activity that resembled physiological BMPs, and implementation of the engram reproduced increases in frequency, regularity, and bias. Combined enhancement of B30, B63, and B65 excitabilities increased BMP frequency and regularity, but not bias toward iBMPs. Individually, B30 increased regularity and bias, B51 increased bias, B63 increased frequency, and B65 decreased all three BMP features. Combined synaptic plasticity contributed primarily to regularity, but also to frequency and bias. B63–B30 coupling contributed to regularity and bias, and B63–B65 coupling contributed to all BMP features. Each site of plasticity altered multiple BMP features simultaneously. Moreover, plasticity loci exhibited mutual dependence and synergism. These results indicate that the memory for operant reward learning emerged from the combinatoric engagement of multiple sites of plasticity.