Abstract
ABSTRACTMutation bias is an important factor determining the diversity of genetic variants available for selection, and can therefore constrain the genetic paths to adaptation. An additional constraint emerges over the course of evolution. As adaptation proceeds and some beneficial mutations are fixed, new beneficial mutations become rare, limiting further adaptation. Recent theoretical work predicts that these constraints may be alleviated by a change in the direction of mutation bias (i.e., a bias reversal). As populations sample previously underexplored types of mutations, the distribution of fitness effects (DFE) of mutations should shift towards more beneficial mutations. Here, we test this prediction usingEscherichia coli, which has a transition mutation bias, with ∼55% of single-nucleotide mutations being transitions compared to the unbiased expectation of ∼33% transitions. We generated mutant strains with a wide range of mutation biases from 96% transitions to 98% transversions, either reinforcing or reversing the wild type transition bias. Quantifying DFEs of hundreds of single mutations obtained from mutation accumulation experiments for each strain, we find strong support for the theoretical prediction. Strains that oppose the ancestral bias (i.e., with a strong transversion bias) have DFEs with the highest proportion of beneficial mutations, whereas strains that exacerbate the ancestral transition bias have up to 10-fold fewer beneficial mutations. Such dramatic differences in the DFE should drive large variation in the rate and outcome of adaptation. Our results thus strongly suggest an important and generalized evolutionary role for mutation bias shifts.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory