The Impact of Anesthesia on Ultrasonic Glymphatic Perturbation Protocol: Alertness, and Glymphatic Influx

Author:

Xiao Haijun,Shrestha Binita,Cruz Alexander Aviles,Iliff Jeffrey J,Porter Tyrone,Aryal MunaORCID

Abstract

AbstractWe have recently discovered that transcranial low-intensity focused ultrasound can enhance glymphatic transport, which facilitates the removal of waste metabolites from the brain in a preclinical rat model [1]. The central hypothesis was that ultrasound, functioning as a pressure wave, has the potential to influence the convective forces generated by arterial pulsations, which are also pressure waves, serving as the primary mechanism for glymphatic transport. Importantly, our data revealed that (i) the ultrasound protocol (650 kHz at 0.2MPa for 10 minutes to the entire brain) is safe, as histological evaluations showed no parenchymal damage and no difference in levels of neuronal degeneration or astrocytic activation 72 hours after the intervention, and (ii) the required pressure is significantly low, 10 times below FDA-approved limits for diagnostic ultrasound, and can be achieved using existing FDA-approved clinical transcranial focused ultrasound systems, suggesting its ease of translation into clinical applications. However, the study was conducted under specific physiological states with approximately 2.5% isoflurane-induced anesthesia. There is a limitation in fully understanding the potential bioeffects of ultrasound within the glymphatic space across various physiological conditions, primarily because the glymphatic transport’s efficiency fluctuates with anesthetically induced physiological states. Hence, establishing standardized protocols of ultrasonic glymphatic transport at optimal physiological state is crucial for ensuring consistent, reliable results across research laboratories during the preclinical development of this technique. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate how ultrasonically manipulated glymphatic transport is influenced by different levels of isoflurane-induced anesthetic conditions, including 3% (just above 2.5%), 2% (slightly below 2.5%), and 1.5% (quasi-awake state, resembling the existing clinical practice of ultrasound treatment). Results show that the impact of ultrasound during glymphatic transport depends on the level of anesthesia. It increases alertness in lightly anesthetized animals and improves glymphatic transport, while it induces drowsiness in heavily anesthetized animals, leading to reduced glymphatic transport. The results suggest that lighter anesthesia is beneficial for efficient ultrasonic glymphatic transport, making it more in line with the awake state in current clinical ultrasound treatments, thus advancing the technology closer to clinical translation.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3