Awake prone positioning effectiveness in moderate to severe COVID-19 a randomized controlled trial
Author:
Phong Nguyen Thanh, Duc Du Hong, Hai Ho Bich, Nguyen Thanh Nguyen, Khoa Le Dinh Van, Khanh Le Thuy Thuy, Tran Luu Hoai Bao, Linh Nguyen Thi My, Van Cao Thi Cam, Thao Dang Phuong, Trinh Nguyen Thi Diem, Kieu Pham Tieu, Truong Nguyen Thanh, Hoang Vo Tan, Ngoc Nguyen Thanh, Vien Tran Thi Dong, Ly Vo Trieu, Khoa Tran Dang, Beane Abigail, Anibal James, Thwaites Guy E, Geskus Ronald B, Clifton David, Dung Nguyen Thi Phuong, Kestelyn Evelyne, Glover Guy, Tan Le VanORCID, Yen Lam Minh, Tung Nguyen Le Nhu, Dung Nguyen Thanh, Thwaites C LouiseORCID,
Abstract
AbstractObjectivesWe evaluated the efficacy and acceptability of awake-prone positioning (APP) in a randomised controlled trial, using a dedicated APP implementation team and wearable continuous-monitoring devices to monitor position and oximetry.MethodsThe trial was performed at a tertiary level hospital in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, recruiting adults (≥18 years) hospitalised with moderate or severe COVID-19 and receiving supplemental oxygen therapy via nasal/facemask systems or high-flow nasal canulae. Participants were randomized (1:1) to standard care or APP. The primary outcome was escalation of respiratory support within 28 days of randomisation.ResultsNinety-three patients were enrolled between March 2022 and March 2023; 80 (86%) had received ≥2 doses of SARS-CoV2 vaccine. Significantly greater mean daily APP times were achieved in those allocated to APP, although most did not achieve the target 8 hours/day. We did not detect significant differences in the primary outcome (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.40-1.78, p=0.67) or secondary outcomes, including intubation rate and 28-day mortality. Particpants reported prone positioning was comfortable, although almost all preferred supine positioning. No adverse events associated with the intervention were reported.ConclusionsAPP was not associated with benefit, but was safe. Continuous monitoring with wearable devices was feasible and acceptable to patients.Clinical Trials RegistrationNCT05083130FundingWellcome Trust Grant 089276/B/09/7, 217650/Z/19/Z and FDCO/Wellcome Trust 225437/Z/22/Z
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference21 articles.
1. Prone Positioning in Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome 2. Ehrmann S , Li J , Ibarra-Estrada M , Perez Y , Pavlov I , McNicholas B , et al. Awake prone positioning for COVID-19 acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure: a randomised, controlled, multinational, open-label meta-trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2021;2600(21). 3. Awake prone positioning for non-intubated patients with COVID-19-related acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis;Lancet Respir Med,2022 4. Qian ET , Gatto CL , Amusina O , Dear ML , Hiser W , Buie R , et al. Assessment of Awake Prone Positioning in Hospitalized Adults With COVID-19. JAMA Intern Med. 2022; 5. Fralick M , Colacci M , Munshi L , Venus K , Fidler L , Hussein H , et al. Prone positioning of patients with moderate hypoxaemia due to covid-19: Multicentre pragmatic randomised trial (COVID-PRONE). The BMJ. 2022;(February 2020).
|
|