SciCV, the Swiss National Science Foundation’s new CV format

Author:

Strinzel MichaelaORCID,Kaltenbrunner WolfgangORCID,van der Weijden IngeORCID,von Arx MartinORCID,Hill MichaelORCID

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundThe Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) tested a new CV format called SciCV to encourage fair, DORA-compliant assessment of grant applicants. It was developed in close collaboration with the academic evaluation community and international experts, introduced through detailed change management and finally tested in its utility by an independent research team of the Center for Science and Technology Studies Leiden (CWTS).MethodsWe present the development of the SciCV pilot and its evaluation by the CWTS research group. The analysis comprised both quantitative and qualitative methods, with (i) surveys and semi-structured interviews with applicants and reviewers, (ii) text analysis of the narrative elements of SciCV, and (iii) participant observation in ten evaluation panel meetings.ResultsNarrative elements and the inclusion of the academic age were rated as most useful new CV elements, while the inclusion of two metrics, the h-index and the relative citation ratio, were received more critically. The omission of a full publication list had similar numbers of supporters and opponents among applicants and reviewers. Less experienced and junior applicants and reviewers rated the new format generally more positively than more senior applicants and reviewers. The text analysis of narrative elements yielded no significant gender specific differences. The participant observation revealed that the new elements in SciCV broadened the information base used in the evaluation of applicants but did not fundamentally alter traditional, publication-centred evaluation practices.ConclusionSciCV was a relevant and successful initiative for the SNSF, which showed that the implementation of a new, well-structured CV format is not only feasible but also something that many stakeholders welcome.The extensive experience and results obtained during the change process formed the basis for the development of SciCV 2.0 at the SNSF. It also offers a basis and guidance for other funding organisations planning similar initiatives.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference18 articles.

1. Are you siding with a personality or the grant proposal?’;observations on how peer review panels function. Res Integr Peer Rev,2017

2. Kaltenbrunner W , Rijcke S de , Müller R , Burner-Fritsch I. On the Chronopolitics of Academic CVs in Peer Review. In: Vostal F , editor. Inquiring into Academic Timescapes [Internet]. Emerald Publishing Limited; 2021 [cited 2021 Nov 2]. p. 247–64. Available from: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/978-1-78973-911-420211021/full/html

3. Ten ways to improve academic CVs for fairer research assessment;Humanit Soc Sci Commun,2021

4. Bonn NA , Bouter L. Research assessments should recognize responsible research practices — Narrative review of a lively debate and promising developments [Internet]. MetaArXiv; 2021 [cited 2021 Sep 20]. Available from: https://osf.io/preprints/metaarxiv/82rmj/

5. Science needs more external evaluation, not less;Soc Sci Inf,2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3