Abstract
Have you ever felt your passion for research slowly erode under the weight of unfair practices and relentless pressure to publish? Or been denied authorship credit for work you tirelessly contributed to? If so, you are not alone. This is the harsh reality for many medical students and early career researchers trapped in a “toxic research culture.” This hidden crisis undermines the integrity of medical research and jeopardizes the well-being and career prospects of those eager to advance science. Despite its prevalence, this issue remains shrouded in silence, propagating cycles of harm and hampering scientific progress.
This editorial explores the evolution of medical research culture, defines the harmful practices that constitute a toxic environment, and highlights the vulnerability of junior researchers to such practices. Manifestations of toxicity, including bullying, harassment, and unethical authorship practices, are analyzed along with their detrimental impacts on mental health. Current policies and strategies for promoting a healthier research environment are discussed. We highlight the urgent need for reforms, including the promotion of whistleblowing without fear, diversifying leadership, revising evaluation criteria, and implementing educational interventions on research ethics as a preventive measure. Additionally, we explore the impact of fake mentors within academia, advising vigilance against individuals who exploit their roles for personal agendas rather than genuine mentorship.
Through a call to action, we urge stakeholders and institutions to safeguard junior researchers and uphold the integrity of scientific research. IJMS plays a crucial role in this transformation by promoting mentorship, ethical practices, and accessible research.
Publisher
University Library System, University of Pittsburgh
Reference53 articles.
1. Royal Society. Research culture. Available from: https://royalsociety.org/topics-policy/projects/research-culture/. Cited Jun 15, 2024.
2. Kenneth Walker H. The origins of the history and physical examination. Chatswood, NSW, Australia: Butterworths; 1990.
3. UNESCO. Scholarly communication. Available from: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf00002319387. Last updated 2015; cited Jun 17, 2024.
4. Daily Trojan. ‘Publish or Perish’ culture is toxic to academia. Available from: https://dailytrojan.com/2022/02/02/publish-or-perish-culture-is-toxic-to-academia/. Last updated Feb 2, 2022; cited Jun 15, 2024.
5. McKenna HP. Toxic research cultures: The what, why and how. Int J Nurs Stud. 2023;140:104449.