Author:
Sterlin Delphine,Mathian Alexis,Miyara Makoto,Mohr Audrey,Anna François,Claër Laetitia,Quentric Paul,Fadlallah Jehane,Ghillani Pascale,Gunn Cary,Hockett Rick,Mudumba Sasi,Guihot Amélie,Luyt Charles-Edouard,Mayaux Julien,Beurton Alexandra,Fourati Salma,Lacorte Jean-Marc,Yssel Hans,Parizot Christophe,Dorgham Karim,Charneau Pierre,Amoura Zahir,Gorochov Guy
Abstract
AbstractA major dogma in immunology has it that the IgM antibody response precedes secondary memory responses built on the production of IgG, IgA and, occasionaly, IgE. Here, we measured acute humoral responses to SARS-CoV-2, including the frequency of antibody-secreting cells and the presence of specific, neutralizing, antibodies in serum and broncho-alveolar fluid of 145 patients with COVID-19. Surprisingly, early SARS-CoV-2-specific humoral responses were found to be typically dominated by antibodies of the IgA isotype. Peripheral expansion of IgA-plasmablasts with mucosal-homing potential was detected shortly after the onset of symptoms and peaked during the third week of the disease. While the specific antibody response included IgG, IgM and IgA, the latter contributed to a much larger extent to virus neutralization, as compared to IgG. However, specific IgA serum levels notably decrease after one month of evolution. These results represent a challenging observation given the present uncertainty as to which kind of humoral response would optimally protect against re-infection, and whether vaccine regimens should consider boosting a potent, although, at least in blood, fading IgA response.One sentence SummaryWhile early specific antibody response included IgG, IgM and IgA, the latter contributed to a much larger extent to virus neutralization.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Cited by
59 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献