Author:
Atkeson Andrew,Droste Michael,Mina Michael J.,Stock James H.
Abstract
AbstractWe assess the economic value of screening testing programs as a policy response to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. We find that the fiscal, macroeconomic, and health benefits of rapid SARS-CoV-2 screening testing programs far exceed their costs, with the ratio of economic benefits to costs typically in the range of 2-15 (depending on program details), not counting the monetized value of lives saved. Unless the screening test is highly specific, however, the signal value of the screening test alone is low, leading to concerns about adherence. Confirmatory testing increases the net economic benefits of screening tests by reducing the number of healthy workers in quarantine and by increasing adherence to quarantine measures. The analysis is undertaken using a behavioral SIR model for the United States with 5 age groups, 66 economic sectors, screening and diagnostic testing, and partial adherence to instructions to quarantine or to isolate.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference37 articles.
1. Acemoglu, D. , A. Makhdoumi , A. Malekian , and A. Ozdaglar (2020). Testing, Voluntary Social Distancing and the Spread of an Infection. NBER Working Paper 27483.
2. Diagnostic performances of the Xpert ® Flu PCR test and the OSOM ® immunochromatographic rapid test for influenza A and B virus among adult patients in the Emergency Department
3. Arnon, A. , J. Ricco , and K. Smetters (2020). “Epidemiological and Economic Effects of Lockdown,” forthcoming, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Fall 2020.
4. Augenblick, N. , J. Kolstad , Z. Obermeyer , and A. Wang (2020). Group Testing in a Pandemic: The Role of Frequent Testing, Correlated Risk, and Machine Learning. NBER Working Paper 27457.
5. Baqaee, D.R. , E. Farhi , M. Mina , and J.H. Stock (2020a). Reopening Scenarios. NBER Working Paper 27244.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献