Utilizing virtual experiments to increase understanding of discrepancies involving in vitro-in vivo predictions of hepatic clearance

Author:

Krishnan PreethiORCID,Smith Andrew K.ORCID,Ropella Glen E.P.ORCID,Dutta LopamudraORCID,Kennedy Ryan C.ORCID,Hunt C. AnthonyORCID

Abstract

AbstractWe explore a virtual experiment strategy to discover plausible mechanism-based explanations for frequently inaccurate predictions of hepatic drug clearance made using established in vitro-in vivo extrapolation methods. We describe a three-protocol plan that uses validated software analogs of real in vitro and in vivo systems constructed using a common set of objects, components, spaces, and methods. Both systems utilize identical quasi-autonomous hepatocyte analogs containing enzyme-like objects. We parameterize concrete mobile objects (virtual compounds) to simulate the referent drug’s disposition and removal characteristics in vitro and in vivo. The goal of Protocol one (Protocol two) is that measures of virtual compound removal using the in vitro analog (in vivo analog) map directly to the measurements used to compute intrinsic clearance (in vivo hepatic clearance). Protocol three, the focus of this work, requires achieving an essential cross-system validation target. For a subset of virtual compounds, measurements of unbound compounds entering hepatocytes (and their subsequent removal) during virtual in vitro experiments will directly predict corresponding measures made during virtual in vivo experiments. We study four highly permeable virtual compounds when their unbound fraction is fixed at one of seven values (0.05-1.0). Results span the range of hepatic extraction ratios. We achieve the cross-system validation target in 15 cases. In the other 13 cases, explanations of the in vitro-in vivo differences in disposition and removal trace to differences in compound-hepatocyte access within the two analogs during execution. The hepato-mimetic structural organization of hepatocytes within the in vivo analog, which is absent within the in vitro analog, is the determining factor. The results taken together support the feasibility of using the three-protocol plan to help explain observed in vitro-in vivo extrapolation discrepancies. We conjecture that, for some cases, the model mechanism-based explanations of discrepancies described herein will have wet-lab counterparts.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3