Abstract
AbstractIntroductionResults of the CLARITY-AD and GRADUATE I and II trials rekindled discussion on the impact of amyloid-targeting drugs. We use a Bayesian approach to quantify how a rational observer would have updated their prior beliefs based on new trial results.MethodsWe used publicly available data from the CLARITY-AD and GRADUATE I & II trials to estimate the effect of reducing amyloid on CDR-SB score. A range of prior positions were then updated according to Bayes Theorem using these estimates.ResultsAfter updating with new trial data, a wide range of starting positions resulted in credible intervals that did not include no effect of amyloid reduction on CDR-SB.DiscussionFor a range of starting beliefs and assuming veracity of underlying data, rational observers would conclude there is a small benefit of amyloid-reductions on cognition. This benefit must be weighed against opportunity cost and side effect risk.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference36 articles.
1. Lecanemab in Early Alzheimer’s Disease;New England Journal of Medicine,2023
2. Lecanemab for Alzheimer’s disease
3. Hardy J , Mummery C. An anti-amyloid therapy works for Alzheimer’s disease: why has it taken so long and what is next? Brain. 2023 Feb 17;awad049.
4. An Ethical Argument for Ending Human Trials of Amyloid-Lowering Therapies in Alzheimer’s Disease;AJOB Neuroscience,2022
5. Effect of reductions in amyloid levels on cognitive change in randomized trials: instrumental variable meta-analysis;BMJ,2021