Bivalent mRNA-1273.214 vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 omicron XBB* infections

Author:

Chemaitelly HiamORCID,Ayoub Houssein H.ORCID,AlMukdad SawsanORCID,Faust Jeremy Samuel,Tang PatrickORCID,Coyle PeterORCID,Yassine Hadi M.ORCID,Thani Asmaa A. Al,Al-Khatib Hebah A.ORCID,Hasan Mohammad R.,Al-Kanaani ZainaORCID,Al-Kuwari EinasORCID,Jeremijenko AndrewORCID,Kaleeckal Anvar H.ORCID,Latif Ali N.,Shaik Riyazuddin M.ORCID,Abdul-Rahim Hanan F.ORCID,Nasrallah Gheyath K.ORCID,Al-Kuwari Mohamed G.ORCID,Butt Adeel A.,Al-Romaihi Hamad E.ORCID,Al-Thani Mohamed H.,Al-Khal Abdullatif,Bertollini RobertoORCID,Abu-Raddad Laith J.ORCID

Abstract

AbstractQatar introduced COVID-19 bivalent vaccination for persons ≥12 years old using the 50-μg mRNA-1273.214 vaccine combining SARS-CoV-2 ancestral and omicron BA.1 strains. We estimated effectiveness of this bivalent vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 infection using a matched, retrospective, cohort study. Matched cohorts included 11,482 persons in the bivalent cohort and 56,806 persons in the no-recent-vaccination cohort. During follow-up, 65 infections were recorded in the bivalent cohort and 406 were recorded in the no-recent-vaccination cohort. None progressed to severe, critical, or fatal COVID-19. Cumulative incidence of infection was 0.80% (95% CI: 0.61-1.07%) in the bivalent cohort and 1.00% (95% CI: 0.89-1.11%) in the no-recent- vaccination cohort, 150 days after the start of follow-up. Incidence during follow-up was dominated by omicron XBB* subvariants including XBB, XBB.1, XBB.1.5, XBB.1.9.1, XBB.1.9.2, XBB.1.16, and XBB.2.3. The adjusted hazard ratio comparing incidence of infection in the bivalent cohort to that in the no-recent-vaccination cohort was 0.75 (95% CI: 0.57-0.97). Bivalent vaccine effectiveness against infection was 25.2% (95% CI: 2.6-42.6%). Effectiveness was 21.5% (95% CI: -8.2-43.5%) among persons with no prior infection and 33.3% (95% CI: - 4.6-57.6%) among persons with prior infection. mRNA-1273.214 reduced incidence of SARS- CoV-2 infection, but the protection was modest at only 25%. The modest protection may have risen because of XBB* immune evasion or immune imprinting effects, or combination of both.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3