Proteomic portraits reveal evolutionarily conserved and divergent responses to spinal cord injury

Author:

Skinnider Michael A.ORCID,Rogalski Jason,Tigchelaar Seth,Manouchehri Neda,Prudova Anna,Jackson Angela M.,Nielsen Karina,Jeong Jaihyun,Chaudhary Shalini,Shortt Katelyn,Gallagher-Kurtzke Ylonna,So Kitty,Fong Allan,Gupta Rishab,Okon Elena B.,Rizzuto Michael A.,Dong Kevin,Streijger Femke,Belanger Lise,Ritchie Leanna,Tsang Angela,Christie Sean,Mac-Thiong Jean-Marc,Bailey Christopher,Ailon Tamir,Charest-Morin Raphaele,Dea Nicholas,Wilson Jefferson R.,Dhall Sanjay,Paquette Scott,Street John,Fisher Charles G.,Dvorak Marcel F.,Shannon CaseyORCID,Borchers Christoph,Balshaw Robert,Foster Leonard J.,Kwon Brian K.

Abstract

Despite the emergence of promising therapeutic approaches in preclinical studies, the failure of large-scale clinical trials leaves clinicians without effective treatments for acute spinal cord injury (SCI). These trials are hindered by their reliance on detailed neurological examinations to establish outcomes, which inflate the time and resources required for completion. Moreover, therapeutic development takes place in animal models whose relevance to human injury remains unclear. Here, we address these challenges through targeted proteomic analyses of CSF and serum samples from 111 acute SCI patients and, in parallel, a large animal (porcine) model of SCI. We develop protein biomarkers of injury severity and recovery, including a prognostic model of neurological improvement at six months with an AUC of 0.91, and validate these in an independent cohort. Through cross-species proteomic analyses, we dissect evolutionarily conserved and divergent aspects of the SCI response, and establish the CSF abundance of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) as a biochemical outcome measure in both humans and pigs. Our work opens up new avenues to catalyze translation by facilitating the evaluation of novel SCI therapies, while also providing a resource from which to direct future preclinical efforts.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3