Abstract
AbstractBackgroundPause duration analysis is a common feature in the study of discourse in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and may also be helpful for its early detection. However, studies involving patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) have yielded varying results.ObjectivesTo characterize the probability density distribution of speech pause durations in AD, two multi-domain amnestic MCI patients (with memory encoding deficits, a-mdMCI-E, and with retrieval impairment only, a-mdMCI-R) and healthy controls (HC) in order check whether there are significant differences between them.Method112 picture-based oral narratives were manually transcribed and annotated for the automatic extraction and analysis of pause durations. Different probability distributions were tested for the fitting of pause durations while truncating shorter ranges. Recent findings in the field of Statistics were considered in order to avoid the inherent methodological uncertainty that this type of analysis entails.ResultsA lognormal distribution (LND) explained the distribution of pause duration for all groups. Its fitted parameters (µ,σ) followed a gradation from the group with shorter durations and a higher tendency to produce short pauses (HC) to the group with longer pause durations and a considerably higher tendency to produce long pauses with greater variance (AD). Importantly, a-mdMCI-E produced significantly longer pauses and with greater variability than their a-mdMCI-R counterparts (α = 0.05).ConclusionWe report significant differences at the group level in pause distribution across all groups of study that could be used in future diagnostic tools and discuss the clinical implications of these findings, particularly regarding the characterization of aMCI.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference131 articles.
1. Clinical utility of mild cognitive impairment subtypes and number of impaired cognitive domains at predicting progression to dementia: A 20-year retrospective study;International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry,2020
2. How early can we diagnose Alzheimer disease (and is it sufficient)?;Neurology,2018
3. Dementia prevention, intervention, and care
4. 2018 Alzheimer’s disease facts and figures;Alzheimer’s Association;Alzheimer’s Dementia,2018
5. Prince M , Bryce R , Ferri C (2011) World Alzheimer Report 2011: The benefits of early diagnosis and intervention, London.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献