Development of the Individual Participant Data (IPD) Integrity Tool for assessing the integrity of randomised trials using individual participant data

Author:

Hunter KEORCID,Aberoumand MORCID,Libesman SORCID,Sotiropoulos JXORCID,Williams JORCID,Li WORCID,Aagerup J,Mol BWORCID,Wang RORCID,Barba A,Shrestha NORCID,Webster ACORCID,Seidler ALORCID

Abstract

ABSTRACTIntroductionIncreasing concerns about integrity in medical research have prompted the development of tools to detect untrustworthy studies. Existing tools focus on evaluating aggregate or published data, though some trustworthiness issues may only be detected upon scrutiny of individual participant data (IPD). To address this, we developed the IPD Integrity Tool for detecting integrity issues in randomised controlled trials with IPD available. This manuscript describes the development of this tool.MethodsWe conducted a literature review to collate and map existing integrity items. These were discussed with an expert advisory group, and agreed items were included in a standardised tool and automated where possible. We piloted this tool in two IPD meta-analyses, and conducted preliminary validation checks on 13 datasets with and without known integrity issues in a blinded manner.ResultsThe literature review identified 120 integrity items: 54 could be conducted at the publication or aggregate data (AD) level, 48 required IPD, and 18 were possible with aggregate data, but more comprehensive with IPD. Based on these items, an initial reduced tool was developed in a consensus process involving 13 advisors with different backgrounds (countries, profession, education). This initial tool included 11 items across four domains for AD, and 12 items across 8 domains requiring IPD. The tool was iteratively refined throughout piloting on two IPD meta-analyses including a total of 116 trials (73 with IPD, and 43 with only AD available), and preliminary validation using an additional 13 datasets. All five studies with known integrity issues were accurately identified during validation. The final version of the tool included seven domains with 13 items for AD and eight domains with 18 items requiring IPD.ConclusionsThe quality of evidence informing health care relies on trustworthy data. This manuscript describes the development of a tool to enable researchers, editors, and other stakeholders to detect integrity issues in randomised trials using IPD. Detailed instructions on the application of this tool will be published subsequently.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference41 articles.

1. Violation of research integrity principles occurs more often than we think;Reproductive BioMedicine Online,2022

2. Fostering integrity in research: Definitions, current knowledge, and future directions

3. Kohl CBS , Faggion CM . A comprehensive overview of studies that assessed article retractions within the biomedical sciences. Accountability in Research 2022:1–19.

4. What is research integrity? (Research and Innovation) Imperial College London [Internet]. [Accessed 22 Feb 2023 ]. Available at: https://www.imperial.ac.uk/research-and-innovation/research-office/research-governance-and-integrity/research-integrity/what-is-research-integrity/.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3