Abstract
AbstractStatic statistical regularities in the placement of targets and salient distractors within the search display can be learned and used to optimize attentional guidance. Whether statistical learning also extends to dynamic regularities governing the placement of targets and distractors on successive trials has been less investigated. Here, we applied the same dynamic cross-trial regularity (one-step shift of the critical item in clock-/counterclockwise direction) either to the target or a distractor, and additionally varied whether the distractor was defined in a different (color) or the same dimension (shape) as the target. We found robust learning of the predicted target location: processing of the target at this (vs. a random) location was facilitated. But we found no evidence of proactive suppression of the predictable distractor location. Facilitation of the anticipated target location was associated with explicit awareness of the dynamic regularity, whereas participants showed no awareness of the distractor regularity. We propose that this asymmetry arises because, owing to the target’s central role in the task set, its location is explicitly encoded in working memory, enabling the learning of dynamic regularities. In contrast, the distractor is not explicitly encoded; so, statistical learning of distractor locations is limited to static regularities.Public significance statementCan we learn the cross-trial dynamic regularity of a target or a task-irrelevant salient distractor (e.g., one-step shift of the critical item in clock-/counterclockwise direction) to boost search performance? The present study found robust learning of the predicted target location, but no evidence of proactive suppression of the predictable distractor location. Facilitation of the anticipated target location was associated with explicit awareness of the dynamic regularity. This asymmetry highlights the important role of the target-centered task set in the learning of dynamic regularities.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference44 articles.
1. Inter-trial effects in priming of pop-out: Comparison of computational updating models;PLoS Computational Biology,2021
2. Allenmark, F. , Zhang, B. , Liesefeld, H. R. , Shi, Z. , & Müller, H. J. (2019). Probability cueing of singleton-distractor regions in visual search: the locus of spatial distractor suppression is determined by colour swapping. In Visual Cognition (pp. 1–19). https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2019.1666953
3. Allenmark, F. , Zhang, B. , Shi, Z. , & Müller, H. J. (2022). Learning to suppress likely distractor locations in visual search is driven by the local distractor frequency. In bioRxiv (p. 2022.04.29.489854). https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.29.489854
4. Uncertainty modulates value-driven attentional capture;Attention, Perception & Psychophysics,2021
5. The Ishihara Test for Color Blindness;American Journal of Optometry and Physiological Optics,1924
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献