Abstract
AbstractIntroductionAntimicrobial stewardship and patient safety strategies include early intravenous-to-oral switch (IVOS) for antimicrobials.AimThis rapid review aimed to assess and collate IVOS criteria from the literature to achieve safe and effective antimicrobial IVOS in the hospital inpatient adult population.MethodThe rapid review follows the PRISMA statement and is registered with PROSPERO. Systematic literature searches were conducted. Articles of adult populations published between 2017-2021 were included. IVOS criteria from UK hospital IVOS policies were categorised to inform the framework synthesis of the literature criteria.ResultsIVOS criteria from 45/164 (27%) UK IVOS policies were categorised into a 5-section framework: 1-Timing of IV antimicrobial review, 2-Clinical signs and symptoms, 3-Infection markers, 4-Enteral route, and 5-Infection exclusions. The literature search identified 477 papers, of which 16 were included. The most common timing for review was 48-72 hours from initiation of intravenous antimicrobial (n=5, 30%). Nine studies (56%) stated clinical signs and symptoms must be improving. Temperature was the most frequently mentioned infection marker (n=14, 88%). Endocarditis had the highest mention as an infection exclusion (n=12, 75%). Overall, 33 IVOS criteria were identified to go forward into the Delphi process.ConclusionThrough the rapid review, 33 IVOS criteria were collated and presented within 5 distinct and comprehensive sections. The literature highlighted the possibility of reviewing IVOS before 48-72 hours, and of presenting HR, BP and RR as a combination early warning score criterion. The criteria identified can serve as a starting point of IVOS criteria review for any institution globally, as no country or region limits were applied. Further research is required to achieve consensus on IVOS criteria from healthcare professionals that manage patients with infections.What is already known on this topicAntimicrobial intravenous-to-oral switch has benefits such as decreased risk of catheter-related infections, reduced equipment costs and increased patient mobility and comfort. Acute hospitals often develop and implement individualised IVOS policies with varying levels of evidence base.What this study addsThis study provides evidence-based IVOS criteria to standardise practice in hospital settings.How this study might affect research, practice or policyIVOS criteria can be taken forward through a consensus process with healthcare professionals providing the care for hospitalised adult patients and making the decisions regarding infection management. In the acute hospital setting, IVOS criteria can be operationalised to promote best practice. The criteria can also be considered as part of organisation-wide audits and quality/policy incentives.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference51 articles.
1. Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: a systematic analysis;Lancet,2022
2. O’Neill J. Tackling drug-resistant infectios globally: final report and recommendations. 2016, [Date accessed: August 2022]: https://apo.org.au/sites/default/files/resource-files/2016-05/apo-nid63983.pdf.
3. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Summary of the latest data on antibiotic consumption in the European Union. 2017, [Date accessed: August 2022]: https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/Final_2017_EAAD_ESAC-Net_Summary-edited%20-%20FINALwith%20erratum.pdf.
4. UK Health Security Agency. English surveillance programme for antimicrobial utilisation and resistance (ESPAUR) report. 2021, [Date accessed: August 2022]: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/english-surveillance-programme-antimicrobial-utilisation-and-resistance-espaur-report.
5. What is antimicrobial stewardship?