The impact of income-support interventions on life course risk factors and health outcomes during childhood: a systematic review in high income countries

Author:

Boccia DeliaORCID,Maritano Silvia,Pizzi CostanzaORCID,Richiardi Matteo GORCID,Lioret SandrineORCID,Richiardi LorenzoORCID

Abstract

AbstractIn high income countries one in five children still lives in poverty. This is known to adversely shape the life course health trajectory of these children; however, much less is understood on whether social and fiscal policies have the capacity to reverse this damage, which intervention is likely to be most effective and when these interventions should be delivered to maximise their impact. This systematic review attempts to address these questions by looking at the impact of income-support interventions delivered during the first 1,000 days of life on cardiovascular, metabolic, respiratory and mental health outcomes. The review was restricted to experimental or quasi experimental studies conducted in high income countries. Studies of interest were retrieved from multidisciplinary database as well as health, economic, social sciences-specific literature browsers. Evidence of interest were summarised via narrative synthesis approach. Robustness of findings was assessed by tabulating impact by health outcome, type of intervention and study design. Overall, 18 relevant papers were identified, including 16 independent studies, one meta-analysis of randomized control trials (RCTs) and one pooled analysis of RCTs. Income-support interventions included: unconditional/conditional cash transfers, income tax credit, welfare to work, and minimum wage salary policies. Most studies were conducted in North America. Overall, the evidence suggested a positive, albeit small, effect of most policies on birth weight outcomes, but limited effect on mental health indicators. Results seemed to be robust to the type of intervention, but not to the study design, with RCTs consistently less likely to detect an impact. Given the large number of people targeted by these programs, one could infer that – despite small – the observed effect may be still relevant at population level. Nonetheless, the limited generalisability of the evidence gathered hampers firm conclusions. For the future, the breath and scope of this literature need to be broadened to fully exploit the potential of these interventions and understand how their public health impact can be maximised.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3