The role of the environment in transmission of antimicrobial resistance between humans and animals: a modelling study

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundAntimicrobial resistance can be transmitted between animals and humans both directly or indirectly, through transmission via the environment (such as fomites or sewage). However, there is a lack of understanding of, and quantitative evidence about, the contribution of the environment to AMR epidemiology. In this study we incorporate the transmission of resistance via the environment into a mathematical model to study the potential importance of this form of transmission for human resistance levels and any effects of the impact of interventions to reduce antibiotic consumption in animals.MethodsWe developed a compartmental model of human-animal AMR transmission with an additional environmental compartment. We compared the outcomes of this model under different human-animal-environment transmission scenarios, conducted a sensitivity analysis, and investigated the impact of curtailing antibiotic usage in animals on resistance levels in humans.ResultsOur findings suggest that human resistance levels are most sensitive to both parameters associated with the human compartment (rate of loss of resistance from humans) and parameters associated with the environmental compartment (rate of loss of resistance from the environment and the transmission rate from the environment to humans). The impact of curtailing antibiotic consumption in animals on long term prevalence of AMR in humans was weaker when environmental transmission was assumed to be high.ConclusionsThis study highlights that environment-human sharing of resistance can influence the epidemiology of resistant bacterial infections in humans and reduce the impact of interventions that curtail antibiotic consumption in animals. More data on the types and dynamics of resistance in the environment and frequency of human-environment transmission is crucial to understanding the population dynamics of antibiotic resistance.