Abstract
AbstractBackgroundThe electronic health record (EHR) is integral to improving healthcare efficiency and quality. Its successful implementation hinges on patient willingness to use it, particularly in Germany where concerns about data security and privacy significantly influence usage intention. Little is known, however, about how specific characteristics of medical data influence patients’ intention to use the EHR.ObjectiveThis study aims to validate the Privacy Calculus Model (PCM) in the EHR context and to assess how personal and disease characteristics, namely disease-related stigma and disease time course, affect PCM predictions.MethodsAn online survey was conducted to empirically validate the PCM for EHR, incorporating a case vignette varying in disease-related stigma (high/low) and time course (acute/chronic), with 241 German participants. The data were analyzed using SEM-PLS.ResultsThe model explains R²=71.8% of the variance in intention to use. The intention to use is influenced by perceived benefits, data privacy concerns, trust in the provider, and social norms. However, only the disease’s time course, not stigma, affects this intention. For acute diseases, perceived benefits and social norms are influential, whereas for chronic diseases, perceived benefits, privacy concerns, and trust in the provider influence intention.ConclusionsThe PCM validation for EHRs reveals that personal and disease characteristics shape usage intention in Germany. This suggests the need for tailored EHR adoption strategies that address specific needs and concerns of patients with different disease types. Such strategies could lead to a more successful and widespread implementation of EHRs, especially in privacy-conscious contexts.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference54 articles.
1. Galetsi P , Katsaliaki K , Kumar S . Values, challenges and future directions of big data analytics in healthcare: A systematic review. Social Science & Medicine 2019; 241: 112533.
2. Medical 4.0 technologies for healthcare: Features, capabilities, and applications;Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems,2022
3. Bertram N , Püschner F , Gonçalves ASO , et al. Einführung einer elektronischen Patientenakte in Deutschland vor dem Hintergrund der internationalen Erfahrungen. In: Klauber J , Geraedts M , Friedrich J , et al. (eds) Krankenhaus-Report 2019. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 3–16.
4. Bundesministerium für Gesundheit (BMG). Die elektronische Patientenakte (ePA), https://www.bundesgesundheitsministerium.de/elektronische-patientenakte.html (2021, accessed 14 April 2023).
5. Patientengruppenspezifische Datenhoheitsbedürfnisse und Akzeptanz der elektronischen Patientenakte