Root and shoot competition lead to contrasting competitive outcomes under water stress: A Meta-analysis

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundCompetition is a critical process that shapes plant communities and interacts with environmental constraints. Though important to natural communities and agricultural systems, there are surprising knowledge gaps related to mechanisms that belie those processes: the contribution of different plant parts on competitive outcomes and the effect of environmental constraints on these contributions.ObjectiveStudies that partition competition into root-only and shoot-only interactions assess whether plant parts impose different competitive intensities using physical partitions and serve as an important way to fill knowledge gaps. Given predicted drought escalation due to climate change, we focused meta-analytic techniques on the effects of water supply and competitive outcomes.MethodsWe searched Web of Science for peer-reviewed studies and found 2042 results. From which six suitable studies with 92 effect sizes on 10 species were identified to test these effects.ResultsWater availability and competition treatment (root-only, shoot-only, and full plant competition) significantly interact to affect plant growth responses (p < 0.0001). Root-only and full plant competition are more intense in low water availability conditions than shoot-only competition. Shoot-only competition in high-water availability was the most intense showing the opposite pattern. These results also show that the intensity of full competition is similar to root-only competition and that low-water availability intensifies root competition while weakening shoot competition.ConclusionsThese results emphasize the importance of root competition and these patterns of competition may shift in a changing climate, creating further urgency for further filling knowledge gaps to address issues of drought on plant interactions and communities.