Abstract
The criticism that voluntary codes of conduct are ineffective can be met by giving greater centrality to human rights in such codes. Provided the human rights obligations of multinational corporations are interpreted as moral obligations specifically tailored to the situation of multinational corporations, this could serve to bring powerful moral force to bear on MNCs and could provide a legitimating basis for NGO monitoring and persuasion. Approached in this way the human rights obligations of MNCs can be taken to include support for political as well as economic rights. This will go some way towards filling the regulatory gap created by the difficulty of controlling the activities of corporations operating globally. However, such a proposal will require a measure of ‘meta-regulation’ whereby the operations of MNCs are legally required to be sufficiently transparent to create the conditions for effective external moral scrutiny
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Philosophy,General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference40 articles.
1. Meintjes G. 2000. “Perspectives on Corporate Codes.” In Williams 2000: 83.
2. OECD. 2000. Guidelinesfor Multinational Enterprises. OECD Document C92000)96/REV1.
3. The Ethics of Policing
4. Human Rights and Multinationals: Is there a Problem?
Cited by
55 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Towards an Ethics Framework for Learning Analytics;Investigating the Impact of AI on Ethics and Spirituality;2023-10-04
2. References;The Ethics of Global Business;2023-02-13
3. Business and Human Rights;Encyclopedia of Business and Professional Ethics;2023
4. Do codes of conduct really mean a change in corporate practices with regard to human rights? Evidence from the largest garment companies worldwide;The International Journal of Human Rights;2022-05-27
5. A poisoned Chalice: homophobia and codes of conduct;International Journal of Law and Management;2020-06-23