Affiliation:
1. Center for Service Management Studies, Baden-Wuerttemberg Cooperative State University (DHBW), Stuttgart 70178, Germany
2. Institute of Management and Organization, Leuphana University of Lüneburg, Lüneburg 21335, Germany
Abstract
AbstractNew technologies can become an identity-challenging threat for organizations. While there is a growing literature on how new technologies challenge fundamental questions of organizational existence such as ‘who are we?’, ‘what do we do?’, and ‘what do we want to be?’, this literature has largely overlooked how new technologies can become drivers of organizational identity change. In this article, we investigate the impact of digitalization, especially Robotic Process Automation, on organizational identity. Drawing on the analysis of shared service centers in Asia and Eastern Europe, we explored how these organizations respond to identity-challenging technologies. While traditionally, work in shared services has been characterized by a combination of standardization, controlling the labor process, and deskilling, we found in this study that shared service organizations are responding to the digital challenges by moving up the value chain to more complex, knowledge-intensive work. As a result, shared service organizations in our study began to redefine their organizational identity by, among others, professionalizing their workforce.
Funder
Ernst & Young GmbHand
OXFORD SAÏD Annual Conference on Professional Service Firms 2019 in Boston
Andrew Brown and members of the Leuphana Organization Studies Research Group
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Strategy and Management,Business and International Management
Reference95 articles.
1. The System of Professions
2. Paradoxical Identity: The Changing Nature of Architectural Work and Its Relation to Architects’ Identity;Ahuja;Journal of Professions and Organization,2017
3. Organizational Identity and Identification: Charting New Waters and Building New Bridges;Albert;Academy of Management Review,2000
4. Qualitative Research and Theory Development: Mystery as Method
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献