Affiliation:
1. Harvard University And National Bureau Of Economic Research
2. Dartmouth College And National Bureau Of Economic Research
Abstract
Abstract
In medicine, the reasons for variation in treatment rates across hospitals serving similar patients are not well understood. Some interpret this variation as unwarranted and push standardization of care as a way of reducing allocative inefficiency. An alternative interpretation is that hospitals with greater expertise in a treatment use it more because of their comparative advantage, suggesting that standardization is misguided. A simple economic model provides an empirical framework to separate these explanations. Estimating this model with data for heart attack patients, we find evidence of substantial variation across hospitals in allocative inefficiency and comparative advantage, with most hospitals overusing treatment in part because of incorrect beliefs about their comparative advantage. A stylized welfare calculation suggests that eliminating allocative inefficiency would increase the total benefits from the treatment that we study by 44%.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Economics and Econometrics
Reference33 articles.
1. “The Determinants of Productivity in Medical Testing: Intensity and Allocation of Care,”;Abaluck;American Economic Review,2016
2. “Hospital-Level Racial Disparities in Acute Myocardial Infarction Treatment and Outcomes,”;Barnato;Medical Care,2005
3. “Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy for Women with Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer: ASCO Clinical Practice Guideline Focused Update,”;Burstein;Journal of Clinical Oncolology,2018
4. “Productivity Dispersion in Medicine and Manufacturing,”;Chandra;American Economic Review,2016
5. “Health Care Exceptionalism? Performance and Allocation in the US Health Care Sector,”;Chandra;American Economic Review,2016
Cited by
22 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献