Development of optimal genetic evaluations for teat and udder structure in Canadian Angus cattle

Author:

Devani Kajal1,Valente Tiago S2,Crowley John J23,Orsel Karin1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Production Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada

2. Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada

3. AbacusBio International Ltd, Roslin Innovation Centre, East Bush, Midlothian, Edinburgh, UK

Abstract

Abstract Despite their heritability and influence on female productivity, there are currently no genetic evaluations for teat and udder structure in Canadian Angus cattle. The objective of this study was to develop optimal genetic evaluations for these traits in the Canadian Angus population. Guidelines recommended by Beef Improvement Federation (BIF) were used to score teat and udder structure in 1,735 Canadian Angus cows from 10 representative herds. Cows scored ranged in parity from 1 to 13; however, >70% of cows were parity ≤4. Scores ranged from 1 (large, bottle shaped) to 9 (very small) for teats and from 1 (very pendulous) to 9 (very tight) for udders. Consistent with parity distribution, >70% of teat and udder scores were ≥6. Teat and udder scores (TS9 and US9, respectively) were modeled using a multiple trait animal model with random effects of contemporary group (herd-year-season) and additive genetic effect, and fixed effects of breed, parity group, and days between calving and scoring. To test good versus poor structure, a binary classification of 1 or 2 (TS2, US2) [comprised of scores 1 to 5 = 1 (poor structure) and scores 6 to 9 = 2 (good structure)] was created. Further, to assess the impact of grouping less frequently observed poor scores, a 1 to 7 scale (TS7, US7) was created by combining teat and udder scores 1 to 3. Analyses for teat and udder scores on scales TS9, US9, TS7, US7, and TS2, US2 were compared. In addition, both threshold and linear animal models were used to estimate variance components for the traits. Data treatment and models were evaluated based on correlation of resulting estimated breeding value (EBV) with corrected phenotypes, Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient, average EBV accuracies (r), and deviance information criteria (DIC). TS9, US9 scales for teat and udder scores and linear models performed best. Estimates of heritability (SE) for teat and udder score were 0.32 (0.06) and 0.15 (0.04), respectively, indicating these traits were moderately heritable and that genetic improvement for teat and udder scores was possible. Estimates of phenotypic and genotypic correlations for teat and udder score were 0.46 (0.02) and 0.71 (0.09), respectively. Estimates of genotypic correlations with birth weight (BW), weaning weight (WW), and yearling weight (YW), ranged from −0.04 (0.10) to −0.20 (0.12), verifying the importance of selecting for improved teat and udder score as individual traits, alongside performance traits.

Funder

Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada

Alberta Livestock and Meat Agency

Alberta Agriculture and Forestry

Canadian Angus Association

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Genetics,Animal Science and Zoology,General Medicine,Food Science

Reference53 articles.

1. American Angus Association . 2017. Technical bulletin: trait heritabilities. http://www.angus.org/agi/gmxadvantagetechnicalbulletin-01-05-18.pdf (Accessed 15 July 2019).

2. National Beef Quality Audit–2016: transportation, mobility, live cattle, and carcass assessments of targeted producer-related characteristics that affect value of market cows and bulls, their carcasses, and associated by-products;Arnold;Transl. Anim. Sci,2017

3. Reasons for disposal of cows in a purebred Hereford and two multibreed synthetic groups under range conditions;Arthur;Can. J. Anim. Sci,1992

4. The effect of cow udder score on subsequent calf performance in the Nebraska Sandhills;Beard;Transl. Anim. Sci,2018

5. Beef Improvement Federation . 2016. Guidelines for uniform beef improvement programs. http://www.beefimprovement.org (Accessed 19 February 2014).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3