National Beef Quality Audit–2016: Transportation, mobility, live cattle, and carcass assessments of targeted producer-related characteristics that affect value of market cows and bulls, their carcasses, and associated by-products1

Author:

Harris M. K.1,Eastwood L. C.1,Boykin C. A.1,Arnold A. N.1,Gehring K. B.1,Hale D. S.1,Kerth C. R.1,Griffin D. B.1,Savell J. W.1,Belk K. E.2,Woerner D. R.2,Hasty J. D.2,Delmore R. J.2,Martin J. N.2,Lawrence T. E.3,McEvers T. J.3,VanOverbeke D. L.4,Mafi G. G.4,Pfeiffer M. M.4,Schmidt T. B.5,Maddock R. J.6,Johnson D. D.7,Carr C. C.7,Scheffler J. M.7,Pringle T. D.8,Stelzleni A. M.8

Affiliation:

1. Department of Animal Science, Texas A&M AgriLife Research, Texas A&M University, College Station 77843

2. Department of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins 80523

3. Beef Carcass Research Center- Department of Agricultural Sciences, West Texas A&M University, Canyon 79016

4. Department of Animal Science, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater 74078

5. Department of Animal Science, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln 68583

6. Department of Animal Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo 58108

7. Department of Animal Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville 32611

8. Department of Animal & Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens 30602

Abstract

Abstract The National Beef Quality Audit–2016 marks the fourth iteration in a series assessing the quality of live beef and dairy cows and bulls and their carcass counterparts. The objective was to determine the incidence of producer-related defects, and report cattle and carcass traits associated with producer management. Conducted from March through December of 2016, trailers (n = 154), live animals (n = 5,470), hide-on carcasses (n = 5,278), and hide-off hot carcasses (n = 5,510) were surveyed in 18 commercial packing facilities throughout the United States. Cattle were allowed 2.3 m2 of trailer space on average during transit indicating some haulers are adhering to industry handling guidelines for trailer space requirements. Of the mixed gender loads arriving at processing facilities, cows and bulls were not segregated on 64.4% of the trailers surveyed. When assessed for mobility, the greatest majority of cattle surveyed were sound. Since the inception of the quality audit series, beef cows have shown substantial improvements in muscle. Today over 90.0% of dairy cows are too light muscled. The mean body condition score for beef animals was 4.7 and for dairy cows and bulls was 2.6 and 3.3, respectively. Dairy cattle were lighter muscled, yet fatter than the dairy cattle surveyed in 2007. Of cattle surveyed, most did not have horns, nor any visible live animal defects. Unbranded hides were observed on 77.3% of cattle. Carcass bruising was seen on 64.1% of cow carcasses and 42.9% of bull carcasses. However, over half of all bruises were identified to only be minor in severity. Nearly all cattle (98.4%) were free of visible injection-site lesions. Current results suggest improvements have been made in cattle and meat quality in the cow and bull sector. Furthermore, the results provide guidance for continued educational and research efforts for improving market cow and bull beef quality.

Funder

Beef Checkoff

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

General Veterinary,Animal Science and Zoology

Reference39 articles.

1. Beef quality assurance national manual;Beef Quality Assurance Advisory Board. n.d

2. National Beef Quality Audit-1995: Survey of producer-related defects and carcass quality and quantity attributes;Boleman;J. Anim. Sci.,1998

3. The influence of the environment on dairy cow behavior, claw health and herd lameness dynamics;Cook;Vet. J.,2009

4. Elanco Animal Health 2009. The 5-point body condition scoring system. https://www.elanco.us/pdfs/ai10752-body-condition-score-insert.pdf (accessed 2 January 2017).

5. Eversole D. E. Browne M. F. Hall J. B. Dietz R. E. 2009. Body condition scoring beef cows. https://www.pubs.ext.vt.edu/400/400-795/400-795.html (accessed 19 April 2017).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3