The ILHBN: challenges, opportunities, and solutions from harmonizing data under heterogeneous study designs, target populations, and measurement protocols

Author:

Chow Sy-Miin1ORCID,Nahum-Shani Inbal2,Baker Justin T34,Spruijt-Metz Donna56,Allen Nicholas B7,Auerbach Randy P8,Dunton Genevieve F59,Friedman Naomi P1011,Intille Stephen S1213,Klasnja Predrag14ORCID,Marlin Benjamin15,Nock Matthew K16171819,Rauch Scott L34,Pavel Misha1213,Vrieze Scott20,Wetter David W2122,Kleiman Evan M23,Brick Timothy R124,Perry Heather1,Wolff-Hughes Dana L25,Bodovski Yosef,Wang Shirlene,Kaslander Jonathan,Chu Daniel,Ponnada Aditya,Braga De Braganca Rebecca,Schloesser Dana,Chi Guanqing,Rivera Daniel,Liebenthal Einat,

Affiliation:

1. Department of Human Development and Family Studies, The Pennsylvania State University , University Park, PA 16802 , USA

2. Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, MI , USA

3. Department of Psychiatry, McLean Hospital , Boson, MA , USA

4. Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School , Boson, MA , USA

5. Department of Psychology, University of Southern California , Los Angeles, CA , USA

6. Center for Economic and Social Research, University of Southern California , Los Angeles, CA , USA

7. Department of Psychology, University of Oregon , Eugene, OR , USA

8. Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University , New York, NY , USA

9. Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, University of Southern California , Los Angeles, CA , USA

10. Institute for Behavioral Genetics, University of Colorado Boulder , Boulder, CO , USA

11. Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder , Boulder, CO , USA

12. Khoury College of Computer Sciences, Northeastern University , Boston, MA , USA

13. Bouvé College of Health Sciences, Northeastern University , Boston, MA , USA

14. School of Information, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, MI , USA

15. College of Information and Computer Sciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst , Amherst, MA , USA

16. Department of Psychology, Harvard University , Cambridge, MA , USA

17. Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital , Boston, MA , USA

18. Franciscan Children’s , Boston, MA , USA

19. Children’s Hospital , Boston, MA , USA

20. Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota , Minneapolis, MN , USA

21. Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah , Salt Lake City, UT , USA

22. Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah , Salt Lake City, UT , USA

23. Department of Psychology, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey , Piscataway, NJ , USA

24. Institute for Computational and Data Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University , University Park, PA , USA

25. National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health , Bethesda, MD , USA

Abstract

Abstract The ILHBN is funded by the National Institutes of Health to collaboratively study the interactive dynamics of behavior, health, and the environment using Intensive Longitudinal Data (ILD) to (a) understand and intervene on behavior and health and (b) develop new analytic methods to innovate behavioral theories and interventions. The heterogenous study designs, populations, and measurement protocols adopted by the seven studies within the ILHBN created practical challenges, but also unprecedented opportunities to capitalize on data harmonization to provide comparable views of data from different studies, enhance the quality and utility of expensive and hard-won ILD, and amplify scientific yield. The purpose of this article is to provide a brief report of the challenges, opportunities, and solutions from some of the ILHBN’s cross-study data harmonization efforts. We review the process through which harmonization challenges and opportunities motivated the development of tools and collection of metadata within the ILHBN. A variety of strategies have been adopted within the ILHBN to facilitate harmonization of ecological momentary assessment, location, accelerometer, and participant engagement data while preserving theory-driven heterogeneity and data privacy considerations. Several tools have been developed by the ILHBN to resolve challenges in integrating ILD across multiple data streams and time scales both within and across studies. Harmonization of distinct longitudinal measures, measurement tools, and sampling rates across studies is challenging, but also opens up new opportunities to address cross-cutting scientific themes of interest.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Behavioral Neuroscience,Applied Psychology

Reference33 articles.

1. The Minnesota population center data integration projects: Challenges of harmonizing census microdata across time and place.;Ruggles,2014

2. Integrative data analysis: The simultaneous analysis of multiple data sets;Curran;Psychol Methods,2009

3. The National Institutes of Health’s Big Data to Knowledge (BD2K) initiative: Capitalizing on biomedical big data;Margolis;J Am Med Inform Assoc,2014

4. The warp and woof of the developmental fabric.;Nesselroade,1991

5. A comparison of IRT linking procedures.;Lee;Appl Meas Educ,2010

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3