Processes for identifying caregivers and screening for caregiver and patient distress in community oncology: results from WF-1803CD

Author:

Nightingale Chandylen L1ORCID,Snavely Anna C2,McLouth Laurie E3,Dressler Emily V2,Kent Erin E4,Adonizio Christian S5,Danhauer Suzanne C1,Cannady Rachel6,Hopkins Judith O7,Kehn Heather8,Weaver Kathryn E1,Sterba Katherine R9

Affiliation:

1. Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest University School of Medicine , Winston-Salem, NC, USA

2. Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, Wake Forest University School of Medicine , Winston-Salem, NC, USA

3. Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky College of Medicine , Lexington, KY, USA

4. Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill , Chapel Hill, NC, USA

5. Center for Oncology Research and Innovation, Geisinger Health , Danville, PA, USA

6. Cancer Caregiver Support, American Cancer Society , Atlanta, GA, USA

7. Hematology and Oncology, Novant Health Cancer Institute, Southeast Clinical Oncology Research Consortium National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program , Winston-Salem, NC, USA

8. Metro Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium , Minneapolis, MN, USA

9. Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina College of Medicine , Charleston, SC, USA

Abstract

Abstract Background Despite their vital roles, informal caregivers of adult cancer patients are commonly overlooked in cancer care. This study describes processes for identifying cancer caregivers and processes for distress screening and management among caregivers and patients in the understudied community oncology setting. Methods Supportive care leaders from the National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program practices completed online survey questions regarding caregiver identification, caregiver and patient distress screening, and distress management strategies. We described practice group characteristics and prevalence of study outcomes. Multivariable logistic regression explored associations between practice group characteristics and caregiver identification in the electronic health record (EHR). Results Most (64.9%, 72 of 111) supportive care leaders reported routine identification and documentation of informal caregivers; 63.8% record this information in the EHR. Only 16% routinely screen caregivers for distress, though 92.5% screen patients. Distress management strategies for caregivers and patients are widely available, yet only 12.6% are routinely identified and screened and had at least 1 referral strategy for caregivers with distress; 90.6% are routinely screened and had at least 1 referral strategy for patients. Practices with a free-standing outpatient clinic (odds ratio [OR] = 0.29, P = .0106) and academic affiliation (OR = 0.01, P = .04) were less likely to identify and document caregivers in the EHR. However, higher oncologist volume was associated with an increased likelihood of recording caregiver information in the EHR (OR = 1.04, P = .02). Conclusions Despite high levels of patient distress screening and management, few practices provide comprehensive caregiver engagement practices. Existing patient engagement protocols may provide a promising platform to build capacity to better address caregiver needs.

Funder

National Institutes of Health

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3