“Pathways”: A hope‐enhancing intervention for patients undergoing treatment for advanced lung cancer

Author:

McLouth Laurie E.12ORCID,Shelton Brent J.23,Bursac Vilma1,Burris Jessica L.24ORCID,Cheavens Jennifer S.5,Weyman Kaitlyn6,Peterman Amy H.7,Corum Lauren2,Studts Jamie L.8,Arnold Susanne M.29

Affiliation:

1. Department of Behavioral Science Center for Health Equity Transformation University of Kentucky College of Medicine Lexington Kentucky USA

2. Markey Cancer Center University of Kentucky Lexington Kentucky USA

3. Division of Cancer Biostatistics Department of Internal Medicine University of Kentucky College of Medicine Lexington Kentucky USA

4. Department of Psychology University of Kentucky College of Arts and Sciences Lexington Kentucky USA

5. Department of Psychology The Ohio State University Columbus Ohio USA

6. Medical College of Wisconsin Affiliated Hospitals Madison Wisconsin USA

7. Department of Psychological Science University of North Carolina–Charlotte Charlotte North Carolina USA

8. Division of Medical Oncology Department of Medicine University of Colorado School of Medicine Aurora Colorado USA

9. Division of Medical Oncology Department of Internal Medicine University of Kentucky College of Medicine Lexington Kentucky USA

Abstract

Abstract (249/250)ObjectiveObservational data suggest hope is associated with the quality of life and survival of people with cancer. This trial examined the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary outcomes of “Pathways,” a hope intervention for people in treatment for advanced lung cancer.MethodsBetween 2020 and 2022, we conducted a single‐arm trial of Pathways among participants who were 3–12 weeks into systemic treatment. Pathways consisted of two individual sessions delivered during infusions and three phone calls in which participants discussed their values, goals, and goal strategies with a nurse or occupational therapist. Participants completed standardized measures of hope and goal interference pre‐ and post‐intervention. Feasibility was defined as ≥60% of eligible patients enrolling, ≥70% of participants completing three or more sessions, ≥70% of participants completing post‐assessments, and mean acceptability ratings ≥7 out of 10 on intervention relevance, helpfulness, and convenience. Linear regression fixed effects models with covariates modeled pre–post changes in complete case analysis and multiple imputation models.ResultsFifty two participants enrolled: female (59.6%), non‐Hispanic White (84.6%), rural (75.0%), and with low educational attainment (51.9% high school degree or less). Except for enrollment (54%), feasibility and acceptability markers were surpassed (77% adherence, 77% retention, acceptability ratings ≥8/10). There was moderate improvement in hope and goal interference from pre‐to post‐intervention (d = 0.51, p < 0.05 for hope; d = −0.70, p < 0.005 for goal interference).ConclusionsStrong feasibility, acceptability, and patient‐reported outcome data suggest Pathways is a promising intervention to increase hope and reduce cancer‐related goal interference during advanced lung cancer treatment.

Funder

National Cancer Institute

National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences

Publisher

Wiley

Reference40 articles.

1. Mixed Anxiety/Depression Symptoms in a Large Cancer Cohort: Prevalence by Cancer Type

2. Goals and confidence as self‐regulatory elements underlying health and illness behavior;Scheier MF;Self‐Regulation Health Illn Behav,2003

3. Adapting to cancer: The importance of hope and purpose.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3