Affiliation:
1. University of Sydney, Department of Agricultural Chemistry and Soil Science, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
Abstract
Abstract
Reliable monitoring technology is an essential component of effective regulation and risk management of environmental contaminants such as pesticides. Most environmental monitoring and analysis is currently conducted using instrumental techniques such as gas–liquid chromatography (GLC) and liquid chromatography (LC). Immunoanalysis provides powerful monitoring techniques that have emerged in the last 3 decades. This paper shows they can deliver rapid, accurate, and relatively inexpensive analysis with high throughput and that have the capability to be field oriented. The technique is versatile in application and can be formatted to suit different purposes such as quantitative analysis or simple “yes/no” tests that are field-portable. While there is a range of opinion on the merits of immunoassays as an analytical tool for pesticides, we suggest that this technology is best considered as complementary to GLC and LC, extending the range of capability for field monitoring. Supporting this view, an increasing number of successful applications of immunoassays to monitoring have been reported in recent years. We also report here the implications of recent developments in the field of immunodiagnostics and their application to monitoring of environmental contaminants. We emphasise that, together with adequate validation by instrumental techniques, immunoassays provide monitoring services yielding realistic and comprehensive data for risk management, allowing decisions on appropriate action by various authorities to be made.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Pharmacology,Agronomy and Crop Science,Environmental Chemistry,Food Science,Analytical Chemistry
Cited by
28 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献